首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Preferences and utilities for the symptoms of moderate to severe allergic asthma.
【24h】

Preferences and utilities for the symptoms of moderate to severe allergic asthma.

机译:中度至重度过敏性哮喘症状的偏好和效用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma have persistent poorly controlled asthma despite inhaled or systemic corticosteroid therapy. New therapies are becoming more widely available to treat such patients, but their value needs to be formally assessed in an economic evaluation. Within a publicly funded health care system such an analysis should reflect societal preferences when measuring treatment benefits. The aim of this study was to elicit societal preferences for the symptom burden associated with moderate to severe allergic asthma. METHOD: Existing daily symptom diary data from a clinical trial were used to develop health state descriptions for evaluation in a standard gamble interview. Five health states were produced that reflected five distinct levels of control ranging from 'complete control of asthma' to 'worsening of asthma', as defined by another outcome measure. The symptom diary data were also used as attributes in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to estimate willingness to pay for improvements in symptoms. Members of the general public (n = 101) completed the interview. RESULTS: Thirteen participants failed the consistency checks and were excluded from the analysis. Societal utility ratings for the health states ranged from 0.71 (worsening of asthma) to 0.78 (complete control of asthma). The participants were also willing to pay 160 pounds a month for the avoidance of all symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The range of utility values (0.71-0.78) demonstrates the severity of moderate to severe allergic asthma. However the spread of scores between complete control of asthma and worsening of asthma was lower than was expected. The community sample placed only a moderate value on the avoidance of all asthma symptoms in the DCE survey. The results suggest that the community sample may not have fully understood the benefits of control over asthma symptoms and the limitations such symptoms can impose on everyday life.
机译:简介:中度至重度过敏性哮喘患者尽管接受吸入或全身性皮质类固醇激素治疗,但仍持续控制不良。新疗法正越来越广泛地用于治疗此类患者,但其价值需要在经济评估中进行正式评估。在公共资助的卫生保健系统中,此类分析应反映出衡量治疗收益时的社会偏好。这项研究的目的是引起社会对与中度至重度过敏性哮喘相关的症状负担的偏爱。方法:使用来自临床试验的每日每日症状日志数据来开发健康状态描述,以进行标准赌博访谈进行评估。产生了五种健康状态,反映出五个不同的控制水平,从“完全控制哮喘”到“哮喘恶化”,这是另一种结果指标所定义的。症状日记数据还用作离散选择实验(DCE)中的属性,以估计为改善症状付出的意愿。公众(n = 101)完成了采访。结果:13名参与者未通过一致性检查,因此被排除在分析之外。健康状况的社会效用等级为0.71(哮喘恶化)至0.78(哮喘完全控制)。参与者还愿意每月支付160英镑来避免所有症状。结论:效用值范围(0.71-0.78)表明中度至重度过敏性哮喘的严重程度。但是,在完全控制哮喘和恶化哮喘之间的分数分布低于预期。在DCE调查中,社区样本对避免所有哮喘症状仅给出了中等值。结果表明,社区样本可能尚未完全了解控制哮喘症状的益处以及此类症状可能对日常生活造成的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号