...
首页> 外文期刊>The Diabetes educator >Rural/urban variations in diabetes self-care and quality of care in a national sample of US adults with diabetes.
【24h】

Rural/urban variations in diabetes self-care and quality of care in a national sample of US adults with diabetes.

机译:在美国成年人糖尿病患者的全国样本中,糖尿病自我护理和护理质量的城乡差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in diabetes self-care and provider-based quality-of-care indicators between rural and urban dwellers in a nationally representative sample of adults with diabetes. METHODS: Data were analyzed on 52,817 individuals with type 2 diabetes from the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. Rural and urban residence was based on metropolitan statistical area. Self-care behaviors (nutrition, physical activity, self-monitoring) and quality-of-care indicators (clinical visits, glycemic control, preventive measures) were self-reported. Logistic regression analyses were done using STATA 10 to assess the independent effect of rural/urban residence on self-care and each quality measure and to account for the complex survey design. RESULTS: Rural residents comprised 21% of the sample and were less likely to receive diabetes education (57% vs 51%, P < .001). The final adjusted model showed that foot self-checks (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.59) and blood glucose testing at least once daily (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.26) were significantly higher among rural individuals. Provider-based quality of care was not significantly different by rural/urban residence. CONCLUSION: Contrary to what has been reported, there were no significant differences in diabetes quality of care between rural and urban dwellers. In addition, rural dwellers appeared to have better self-care behaviors than urban dwellers. Further research is needed to clarify the reasons for these findings.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是在全国有代表性的糖尿病成年人样本中,检查城乡居民之间糖尿病自我护理和基于提供者的护理质量指标的差异。方法:从2007年行为风险因素监测调查中分析了52,817名2型糖尿病患者的数据。乡村和城市居住区基于大都市统计区域。自我报告了自我护理行为(营养,身体活动,自我监控)和护理质量指标(临床就诊,血糖控制,预防措施)。使用STATA 10进行逻辑回归分析,以评估农村/城市居民对自我保健和各项质量指标的独立影响,并解释复杂的调查设计。结果:农村居民占样本的21%,接受糖尿病教育的可能性较小(57%比51%,P <.001)。最终调整后的模型显示,足部自我检查(优势比,1.42; 95%置信区间,1.27-1.59)和每天至少进行一次血糖测试(优势比,1.14; 95%置信区间,1.02-1.26)显着农村人口中较高。基于提供者的医疗质量在农村/城市居民中没有显着差异。结论:与报道的相反,城乡居民在糖尿病护理质量上没有显着差异。此外,农村居民的自我保健行为似乎比城市居民更好。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些发现的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号