首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 886-894)
【24h】

Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 886-894)

机译:基于专业知识的腹腔镜与小切口开腹胆囊切除术的随机临床试验(Br J Surg 2013; 100:886-894)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sir Rosenmiiller and colleagues' expertise-based trial of laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy (LC) versus small-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC) showed no significant differences between these two groups in conversion rate, pain, complications, hospital stay and readmission. However, operating time was significantly shorter for SIOC, whereas short-term quality of life was superior for LC. The comparability and acceptability of SIOC relative to LC is particularly important for surgeons in the developing world where limitations of operating time, hospitalization, equipment maintenance, surgical training, small numbers and cost are major determinants of treatment choice. Of 27 public hospitals in the Caribbean, only eight have adequate equipment and staff to do LC.
机译:Rosenmiiller爵士和他的同事基于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与小切口开腹胆囊切除术(SIOC)进行的基于专业知识的试验显示,两组之间的转换率,疼痛,并发症,住院时间和再入院率没有显着差异。但是,SIOC的手术时间明显缩短,而LC的短期生活质量更高。 SIOC与LC的可比性和可接受性对于发展中国家的外科医生尤其重要,因为手术时间,住院,设备维护,外科手术培训,数量少和成本有限等因素是治疗选择的主要决定因素。在加勒比地区的27家公立医院中,只有8家拥有足够的设备和人员来进行LC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号