首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Results of the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation Registry
【24h】

Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Results of the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation Registry

机译:内镜超声引导的经支气管针抽吸术中21针和22针抽吸针的比较:美国胸科医师学院质量改进注册中心,教育和评估注册中心的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure originally performed using a 22-gauge (22G) needle. A recently introduced 21-gauge (21G) needle may improve the diagnostic yield and sample adequacy of EBUS-TBNA, but prior smaller studies have shown conflicting results. To our knowledge, this is the largest study undertaken to date to determine whether the 21G needle adds diagnostic benefit. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the results of 1,299 patients from the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation (AQuIRE) Diagnostic Registry who underwent EBUS-TBNA between February 2009 and September 2010 at six centers throughout the United States. Data collection included patient demographics, sample adequacy, and diagnostic yield. Analysis consisted of univariate and multivariate hierarchical logistic regression comparing diagnostic yield and sample adequacy of EBUS-TBNA specimens by needle gauge. Results: A total of 1,235 patients met inclusion criteria. Sample adequacy was obtained in 94.9% of the 22G needle group and in 94.6% of the 21G needle group (P = .81). A diagnosis was made in 51.4% of the 22G and 51.3% of the 21G groups (P = .98). Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression showed no statistical difference in sample adequacy or diagnostic yield between the two groups. The presence of rapid onsite cytologic evaluation was associated with significantly fewer needle passes per procedure when using the 21G needle (P <.001). Conclusions: There is no difference in specimen adequacy or diagnostic yield between the 21G and 22G needle groups. EBUS-TBNA in conjunction with rapid onsite cytologic evaluation and a 21G needle is associated with fewer needle passes compared with a 22G needle.
机译:背景:支气管内超声引导的经支气管针抽吸术(EBUS-TBNA)是一种微创手术,最初使用22针(22G)针进行。最近推出的21针(21G)针可能会提高EBUS-TBNA的诊断率和样品充分性,但先前的较小研究显示出相矛盾的结果。据我们所知,这是迄今为止进行的规模最大的研究,目的是确定21G针头是否可以增加诊断价值。方法:我们回顾性评估了2009年2月至2010年9月在美国6个中心接受EBUS-TBNA培训的美国胸科医师学院质量改进注册,教育和评估(AQuIRE)诊断注册中心的1,299例患者的结果。数据收集包括患者的人口统计资料,样本充足性和诊断率。分析由单变量和多元分层逻辑回归组成,通过针规比较EBUS-TBNA标本的诊断率和样品充足性。结果:共有1,235名患者符合入选标准。 22G针组的94.9%和21G针组的94.6%获得了样品充足性(P = .81)。 22G组的诊断率为51.4%,21G组的诊断率为51.3%(P = 0.98)。多元层次logistic回归显示两组之间在样品充足性或诊断产率方面无统计学差异。使用21G针头时,快速现场细胞学评估的存在与每次操作的针头针刺次数明显减少有关(P <.001)。结论:21G和22G针组之间的标本充分性或诊断产率没有差异。与22G针相比,EBUS-TBNA结合快速的现场细胞学评估和21G针与更少的针通过相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号