...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Suffrage or suffering? Voting rights for psychiatric in-patients
【24h】

Suffrage or suffering? Voting rights for psychiatric in-patients

机译:选举权还是痛苦?精神科住院病人的投票权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Before the Representation of the People Act 1949, in-patients in psychiatric settings were usually denied the right to vote in the UK General Elections; instead they were considered unsuitable and labelled (by common law) as 'idiots' or 'lunatics'. Furthermore, the 1949 Act disenfranchised those with mental disorders by refusing to allow patients to register to vote while under the care of psychiatric institutions. This ruling was not revoked until the Electoral Administration Act 2006, 58 years after the advent of 'universal suffrage' in the UK. Currently, patients on psychiatric in-patient units (either informally or detained under civil sections of the Mental Health Act 1983) have a right to register to vote either in person, by post, or by proxy (under the Electoral Administration Act 2006).
机译:在1949年《人民代表法》颁布之前,精神科住院病人通常在英国大选中被剥夺了投票权。取而代之的是,它们被认为是不合适的,并(根据普通法)被标记为“白痴”或“疯子”。此外,《 1949年法令》剥夺了精神疾病患者的权,因为他们拒绝允许患者在精神病院的照料下进行投票。直到2006年《选举管理法》(在英国“普选制”问世58年后),该裁决才被撤销。目前,在精神科住院病房(根据1983年《精神卫生法》的规定以非正式方式或拘留的患者)有权亲自,以邮寄或代理人的方式进行投票登记(根据2006年《选举管理法》)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号