...
首页> 外文期刊>Telemedicine and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association >The use of transtelephonic loop recorders for the assessment of symptoms and arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation.
【24h】

The use of transtelephonic loop recorders for the assessment of symptoms and arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

机译:使用经脑电记录仪评估射频消融后的症状和心律失常复发。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment of arrhythmias. However, patients often remain symptomatic after the procedure. We aimed to assess the arrhythmia recurrence after successful RFA in relation to patients' symptoms using transtelephonic loop recorders. Thirty-six consecutive patients (age 50 +/- 14 years, 17 males/19 females) were enrolled after successful RFA for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (n = 21), AV reentrant tachycardia (n = 8), atrial tachycardia (n = 2), atrial fibrillation/flutter (n = 4), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). During 23 +/- 6 days of follow-up, 679 events were recorded, 246 of which were true arrhythmic events, mostly (56%) asymptomatic. The vast majority of these true arrhythmic events were due to trivial arrhythmias (extrasystoles or sinus tachycardia), equally distributed among symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes. Arrhythmia relapse was shown in four patients, who had a total of nine episodes, eight of which were symptomatic. No high degree AV block was detected. Overall, symptom recurrence had low sensitivity (44%) and high specificity (95%) for the detection of any arrhythmia, and high sensitivity (89%) but low specificity (58%) for the detection of relapse. In conclusion, transtelephonic monitoring was a useful tool for the assessment of symptoms after RFA and its use may be reserved for the most symptomatic patients to detect a relapse or to reassure them for the benign nature of their symptoms.
机译:射频导管消融(RFA)是一种治疗心律不齐的有效方法。但是,手术后患者通常仍保持症状。我们的目的是使用经脑电图记录仪评估RFA成功后与患者症状相关的心律失常复发。成功进行房颤结节性折返性心动过速(n = 21),房室折返性心动过速(n = 8),房室折返性心动过速(n = 8),RFA成功后,连续纳入了36例患者(年龄50 +/- 14岁,男17例,女19例)。 (n = 2),房颤/颤动(n = 4)和室性心动过速(n = 1)。在随访的23 +/- 6天中,记录了679个事件,其中246个为真正的心律不齐事件,大部分(56%)无症状。这些真正的心律不齐事件中的绝大多数是由于琐碎性心律失常(收缩前期或窦性心动过速)所致,在有症状和无症状发作中平均分布。心律失常复发显示在四名患者中,他们共发生了9次发作,其中8次是有症状的。未检测到高度房室传导阻滞。总体而言,症状复发对任何心律失常的检测灵敏度低(44%)和高特异性(95%),对复发的检测灵敏度高(89%)但低特异性(58%)。总之,经电话监测是评估RFA后症状的有用工具,对于大多数有症状的患者,可能保留其使用来检测复发或确保其症状的良性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号