首页> 外文期刊>The clinical respiratory journal. >Predictive value of Berlin Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale for obstructive sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population
【24h】

Predictive value of Berlin Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale for obstructive sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population

机译:柏林问卷和爱泼华嗜睡量表对睡眠门诊人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的预测价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. Objectives: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. Methods: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. Results: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P<0.0001). Conclusions: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.
机译:简介:柏林问卷(BQ)和爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)是针对患有睡眠障碍的受试者广泛使用的两种筛查工具。目的:使用隔夜多导睡眠图作为“黄金标准”,确定入睡我们睡眠诊所的受试者的BQ和ESS的预测准确性。方法:对在我们的睡眠诊所住院的1450名受试者进行BQ和ESS,以进行多导睡眠图评估。结果:1450名受试者中的123名(84.8%)的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5,其中70.5%被归为具有BQ的高睡眠呼吸暂停风险,其中45.9%被归为ESS白天过度嗜睡。在自我报告的高危人群中,BQ预测AHI≥5,敏感性为0.73,特异性为0.44,而自我报告的ESS为0.46,特异性为0.60。当我们选择AHI的临界值为30时,BQ的灵敏度最高(0.80)。当我们一起评估BQ和ESS的预测准确性时,发现两种仪器在AHI临界值为5时的特异性为0.72。 AHIs与每个类别的得分和BQ的总得分显着相关(P <0.0001)。结论:对于进入我们的睡眠诊所的受试者,BQ不能很好地预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。 BQ和ESS一起可用于检测OSA风险低的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号