...
首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >Loco-regional control after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and conservative treatment for locally advanced breast cancer patients
【24h】

Loco-regional control after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and conservative treatment for locally advanced breast cancer patients

机译:局部晚期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗和保守治疗后的局部区域控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) has been validated for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate the difference in loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates between BCT and mastectomy in patients receiving radiation therapy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). A retrospective data base was used to identify all patients with breast cancer undergoing NCT from 2002 to 2007. Patients with initial metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis. LRR was compared between those undergoing BCT and mastectomy. Individual variables associated with LRR were evaluated. Two hundred eighty-four patients were included, 111 (39%) underwent BCT and 173 (61%) mastectomy. Almost all patients (99%) in both groups received postoperative radiation. Pathologic complete response was seen in 37 patients, of which 28 underwent BCT (p < 0.001). Patients receiving mastectomy had more invasive lobular carcinoma (p = 0.007) and a higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001) at diagnosis than those with BCT. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the loco-regional control rate was 91% (95% CI: 86-94%). The 10-year LRR rate was similar in the BCT group (9.2% [95% CI: 4.9-16.7%]) and in the mastectomy group (10.7% [95% CI: 5.9-15.2%]; p = 0.8). Ten-year overall survival (OS) rates (63% [95% CI: 46-79%] in the BCT group; 60% [95% CI: 47-73%] in the mastectomy group, p = 0.8) were not statistically different between the two patient populations. Multivariate analysis showed that AJCC stage ≥ III (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.8; p = 0.02), negative PR (HR: 6; 95% CI: 1.2-30.6, p = 0.03), and number of positive lymph nodes ≥3 (HR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of LRR. Ten-year OS was similar in the BCT and in the mastectomy group (p = 0.1). The rate of LRR was low and did not significantly differ between the BCT and the mastectomy group after NCT. Randomized trials assessing whether mastectomy can be safely omitted in selected breast cancer patients (nonstage III tumors or those which do not require adjuvant hormone suppression) which respond to NCT are required.
机译:保乳治疗(BCT)已针对接受辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者进行了验证。我们的目的是评估在新辅助化疗(NCT)后接受放射治疗的患者中,BCT和乳房切除术之间的局部复发率(LRR)的差异。回顾性数据库用于确定2002年至2007年期间接受NCT的所有乳腺癌患者。本分析不包括初次转移性疾病的患者。比较了接受BCT和乳房切除术的患者的LRR。评估与LRR相关的各个变量。其中包括284例患者,其中111例(39%)接受了BCT,173例(61%)接受了乳房切除术。两组中几乎所有患者(99%)接受术后放射治疗。在37例患者中观察到病理完全缓解,其中28例接受了BCT(p <0.001)。接受乳腺切除术的患者在诊断时比浸润性小肠癌的浸润性小叶癌(p = 0.007)和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期更高(p <0.001)。在6.3年的中位随访中,局部区域控制率为91%(95%CI:86-94%)。 BCT组(9.2%[95%CI:4.9-16.7%])和乳房切除术组(10.7%[95%CI:5.9-15.2%]; p = 0.8)的10年LRR率相似。十年总生存率(BCT组为63%[95%CI:46-79%];乳腺切除术组为60%[95%CI:47-73%],p = 0.8)两组患者之间的统计差异。多变量分析显示AJCC≥III期(HR:2.6; 95%CI:1.2-5.8; p = 0.02),阴性PR(HR:6; 95%CI:1.2-30.6,p = 0.03),阳性数淋巴结≥3(HR:2.5; 95%CI:1.1-5.9; p = 0.03)是LRR的独立预测因子。 BCT和乳房切除术组的十年OS相似(p = 0.1)。 NCT后,BCT和乳房切除术组之间的LRR率低且无明显差异。需要进行随机试验,评估是否可以对某些对NCT有反应的乳腺癌患者(非III期肿瘤或不需要辅助激素抑制的乳腺癌患者)安全地省略乳房切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号