首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >The efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by MDCTA in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction.
【24h】

The efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by MDCTA in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction.

机译:MDCTA术前血管测绘在腹部皮瓣乳房重建中选择皮瓣的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Current methods of breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue include the transverse abdominal myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, deep inferior epigastric arterial perforator (DIEP) flap, superficial inferior epigastric arterial (SIEA) flap, and some other composite flaps. Because of the variant vascular anatomy in abdominal region, it is hard to choose an appropriate flap for a specific patient without accurate preoperative vascular mapping. This study was drawn to address the efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction. A total of 34 breast reconstructions using abdominal flap from December 2006 to July 2009 were included. In all the patients included, MDCTA was performed preoperatively. Three indexes were obtained including choice of flaps, operation time, and flap complication rate. Then, these data were compared with the former data stored in the databank of our hospital from January 2004 to December 2006, before MDCTA was introduced in our center. Among the 34 patients, the flap selection was: SIEA flaps 11.8%, DIEP flaps 61.8%, TRAM flaps 11.8%, and bilateral flaps 14.7%. The correlate indexes from the data bank were as follows: SIEA flap 0; DIEP flaps 51.7%; TRAM flaps 32.8%; bilateral flaps 15.5%. p < 0.05 occurred between the comparison of SIEA, DIEP, and TRAM flap choice in the two groups. The operation time in the study group was as follows: SIEA flap (4.02 +/- 0.46) hours, DIEP flap (6.23 +/- 1.42) hours, TRAM flap (4.72 +/- 1.53) hours, Bilateral flap (7.86 +/- 1.16) hours; while the former correlate data were: DIEP (9.67 +/- 1.74) hours, TRAM flap (6.64 +/- 1.83) hours, bilateral flap (11.83 +/- 1.35) (all the three comparison p < 0.05). The total flap complication rate was about 5.9% in the test group; while in the databank, it was 12.1% (p < 0.05). With the accurate mapping of vascular territory in abdomen by MDCTA, we could easily select a suitable abdominal flap for breast reconstruction, and we can also simplify the procedure to save operation time and make the process more safely.
机译:当前使用腹部组织进行乳房再造的方法包括横腹肌皮(TRAM)皮瓣,上腹深部下动脉穿支线(DIEP)皮瓣,浅表下腹上动脉(SIEA)皮瓣以及其他一些复合皮瓣。由于腹部区域的血管解剖结构不同,如果没有准确的术前血管造影,就很难为特定患者选择合适的皮瓣。这项研究的目的是通过多排行计算机断层摄影血管成像(MDCTA)来解决术前血管造影在腹部皮瓣乳房重建中选择皮瓣的有效性。从2006年12月至2009年7月,总共进行了34次使用腹部皮瓣的乳房再造。在所有患者中,术前均进行了MDCTA。获得了三个指标,包括皮瓣的选择,手术时间和皮瓣并发症发生率。然后,将这些数据与2004年1月至2006年12月在我中心引入MDCTA之前存储在我们医院数据库中的以前的数据进行比较。在34例患者中,皮瓣选择为:SIEA皮瓣11.8%,DIEP皮瓣61.8%,TRAM皮瓣11.8%,双侧皮瓣14.7%。来自数据库的相关指数如下:SIEA襟翼0; DIEP襟翼51.7%; TRAM襟翼32.8%;双边皮瓣15.5%。两组的SIEA,DIEP和TRAM皮瓣选择比较之间出现p <0.05。研究组的手术时间如下:SIEA皮瓣(4.02 +/- 0.46)小时,DIEP皮瓣(6.23 +/- 1.42)小时,TRAM皮瓣(4.72 +/- 1.53)小时,双边皮瓣(7.86 + / -1.16)小时;前者相关数据为:DIEP(9.67 +/- 1.74)小时,TRAM皮瓣(6.64 +/- 1.83)小时,双侧皮瓣(11.83 +/- 1.35)(所有三个比较p <0.05)。试验组的总皮瓣并发症发生率约为5.9%。而在数据库中则为12.1%(p <0.05)。通过MDCTA准确绘制腹部血管区域,我们可以轻松地选择合适的腹部皮瓣进行乳房再造,并且我们还可以简化操作流程以节省手术时间并更加安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号