首页> 外文期刊>The Clinical neuropsychologist >Evaluation of the appropriateness of multiple symptom validity indices in psychotic and non-psychotic psychiatric populations.
【24h】

Evaluation of the appropriateness of multiple symptom validity indices in psychotic and non-psychotic psychiatric populations.

机译:在精神病性和非精神病性精神病人群中评估多种症状有效性指标的适当性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although it is recognized that significant cognitive deficits are inherent in many psychiatric disorders, there is minimal research on whether the deficits can cause a failing score on symptom validity tests (SVTs). The performances of 104 and 178 patients with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic psychiatric disorders, respectively, on seven SVTs were examined. Analyses indicate that most of these SVTs have specificity rates of 90% or better for both clinical groups. Further, only 7% of patients in the psychotic group and 5% of patients in the non-psychotic psychiatric group produced false-positive classifications based on malingering criteria similar to those suggested by Slick et al. (i.e., failure of two or more SVTs or failure of one SVT at statistically significantly worse than chance rates). Consequently this research indicates that psychiatric disorders typically do not adversely affect SVT performance.
机译:尽管已经认识到许多精神疾病固有的明显认知缺陷,但是关于缺陷是否会导致症状有效性测试(SVT)评分失败的研究很少。分别检查了104例和178例精神病性和非精神病性精神病患者在七个SVT上的表现。分析表明,大多数SVT对两个临床组的特异性率为90%或更高。此外,基于类似于Slick等人所建议的假冒标准,精神病组中只有7%的患者和非精神病性精神病组中有5%的患者产生了假阳性分类。 (即,两个或多个SVT的故障或一个SVT的故障在统计上显着低于机会率)。因此,这项研究表明,精神疾病通常不会对SVT性能产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号