...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest: The Journal of Circulation, Respiration and Related Systems >Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide: dependence on breath-hold time.
【24h】

Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide: dependence on breath-hold time.

机译:一氧化氮和一氧化碳的肺扩散能力:取决于屏气时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The combined measurement of diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide (Dlno) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) is a simple, noninvasive tool, but methodologic factors might influence results and reproducibility. We thus quantified the influence of breath-hold time on Dlco and Dlno in subjects with or without airway disease. METHODS: Simultaneous single-breath measurements of Dlco and Dlno were performed in 10 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [mean +/- SD age, 33 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 69 +/- 28% of predicted] and 10 healthy subjects (age, 31 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 108 +/- 8% of predicted), using the Masterscreen PFT (Viasys/Jaeger; Hochberg, Germany), with 45 ppm of inspired nitric oxide (NO), and breath-hold times of 4 s, 6 s, 8 s, and 10 s. The last two of three consecutive measurements were used for analysis. RESULTS: In healthy subjects but not patients with CF, Dlno, and Dlco differed significantly (p < 0.05 each) between breath-hold times. Differences primarily occurred at 4 s and 10 s, while at 6 s and 8 s alveolar volume (VA), Dlno, Dlco, and Dlno/Dlco were similar. Variability of consecutive measurements (either three or the last two measurements) did not depend on breath-hold time. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in healthy subjects were 4.9% and 2.5%, respectively, and 4.2% and 3.2% at 6 s. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in CF patients were 4.4% and 1.9%, and 7.4% and 3.3% at 6 s. CONCLUSIONS: Single-breath determinations of dlno and dlco showed no difference between breath-hold times of 6 s and 8 s in subjects with or without airway obstruction, and reproducibility was acceptable. Standardization of breath-hold time for Dlno measurements seems important for clinical and research comparisons.
机译:背景:肺的一氧化氮(Dlno)扩散能力和肺的一氧化碳(Dlco)扩散能力的组合测量是一种简单,无创的工具,但是方法学因素可能会影响结果和可重复性。因此,我们定量了屏息时间对有或没有气道疾病的受试者的Dlco和Dlno的影响。方法:对10例囊性纤维化(CF)[平均+/- SD年龄为33 +/- 9岁; FEV(1),占预测值的+/- 28%]和10名健康受试者(年龄,31 +/- 9岁; FEV(1),预测值的108 +/- 8%),使用Masterscreen PFT(Viasys / Jaeger; Hochberg,德国),吸入一氧化氮(NO)的含量为45 ppm,屏气时间为4 s,6 s,8 s和10 s。三个连续测量中的最后两个用于分析。结果:在健康受试者中,CF,Dlno和Dlco患者的屏气时间之间存在显着差异(每个p <0.05)。差异主要发生在4 s和10 s,而在6 s和8 s的肺泡体积(VA),Dlno,Dlco和Dlno / Dlco相似。连续测量(三个或最后两个测量)的可变性不取决于屏气时间。在8 s时,健康受试者的Dlno和Dlco平均变异分别为4.9%和2.5%,在6 s时分别为4.2%和3.2%。在8 s时,CF患者的Dlno和Dlco平均变异度分别为4.4%和1.9%,以及6 s时的7.4%和3.3%。结论:单呼吸法测定的dlno和dlco在有或没有气道阻塞的受试者中,在6 s和8 s的屏气时间之间没有差异,可重复性是可以接受的。 Dlno测量的屏气时间标准化对于临床和研究比较似乎很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号