首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >Psychology and phenomenology - A clarification
【24h】

Psychology and phenomenology - A clarification

机译:心理学和现象学-澄清

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Controversies are rampant in contemporary psychology concerning the appropriate method for observing consciousness and the role inner experience should play in psychological theorizing. These conflicting orientations reflect, in part, methodological differences between natural science and human science interpretations of psychology. Humanistic psychology and philosophical phenomenology both employ a human science approach to psychology that seeks to explain behavior in terms of a person's subjective existence. Maslow's and Heidegger's formulations are both fulfillment theories in that they specify moral values that suggest how life ought to be lived. Natural science methodology rejects the possibility that moral imperatives can be validated, whereas human science methodology allows phenomenological convictions to justify recommendations about a fulfilled life and a good society. The social role of psychology is analyzed within the framework of phenomenological convictions and scientific truth.
机译:在当代心理学中,关于观察意识的适当方法和内部经验在心理学理论中应扮演的角色的争论十分猖ramp。这些相互矛盾的方向部分反映了自然科学与人类科学心理学解释之间在方法论上的差异。人文心理学和哲学现象学都采用人类科学的心理学方法,力图用一个人的主观存在来解释行为。马斯洛(Maslow)和海德格尔(Heidegger)的表述都是实现理论,它们指定了道德价值观,这些道德价值观暗示了人们应该如何生活。自然科学方法论拒绝了道德命令可以得到验证的可能性,而人文科学方法论则允许现象学信念为关于充实生活和良好社会的建议辩护。在现象学信念和科学真理的框架内分析了心理学的社会作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号