...
首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >What Do People Who Score Highly on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia Really Believe? A Mixed Methods Investigation in People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
【24h】

What Do People Who Score Highly on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia Really Believe? A Mixed Methods Investigation in People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

机译:在运动恐惧症的坦帕量表上得分最高的人真正相信什么?慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives:The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) has been used to identify people with back pain who have high levels of fear of movement to direct them into fear reduction interventions. However, there is considerable debate as to what construct(s) the scale measures. Somatic Focus and Activity Avoidance subscales identified in factor analytic studies remain poorly defined. Using a mixed methods design, this study sought to understand the beliefs that underlie high scores on the TSK to better understand what construct(s) it measures.Methods:In-depth qualitative interviews with 36 adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain (average duration=7 y), scoring highly on the TSK (average score=47/68), were conducted. Following inductive analysis of transcripts, individuals were classified into groups on the basis of underlying beliefs. Associations between groups and itemized scores on the TSK and subscales were explored. Frequencies of response for each item were evaluated.Findings:Two main beliefs were identified: (1) The belief that painful activity will result in damage; and (2) The belief that painful activity will increase suffering and/or functional loss. The Somatic Focus subscale was able to discriminate between the 2 belief groups lending construct validity to the subscale. Ambiguous wording of the Activity Avoidance subscale may explain limitations in discriminate ability.Discussion:The TSK may be better described as a measure of the beliefs that painful activity will result in damage and/or increased suffering and/or functional loss.
机译:目的:使用坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)来识别背痛的人,他们对运动的恐惧程度很高,可以将他们引导到减轻恐惧的干预措施中。但是,关于衡量尺度的构造有很多争论。在因子分析研究中确定的躯体集中和活动回避子量表的定义仍然不明确。本研究采用混合方法设计,旨在了解TSK高分背后的信念,以便更好地了解其测量的结构。方法:对36名患有慢性非特异性下背痛的成年人进行的深度定性访谈(平均持续时间) = 7年),在TSK上得分很高(平均得分= 47/68)。在对笔录进行归纳分析之后,根据基本信念将个人分为几类。探索了各组之间的关联以及在TSK和分量表上的逐项评分。结果:确定了两个主要信念:(1)痛苦的活动会导致损害的信念; (2)相信痛苦的活动会增加痛苦和/或功能丧失。 Somatic Focus分量表能够区分这两个信念组,从而将构造效度归因于该分量表。活动回避子量表的措词含糊不清可能解释了辨别能力的局限性。讨论:TSK可以更好地描述为一种信念,即认为痛苦的活动会导致损害和/或增加的痛苦和/或功能丧失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号