首页> 外文期刊>The condor >GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER NEST MORTALITY AND PREDATORS IN URBAN AND RURAL LANDSCAPES
【24h】

GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER NEST MORTALITY AND PREDATORS IN URBAN AND RURAL LANDSCAPES

机译:城市和农村景观的金螯鱼死亡率和捕食者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Predation is a major cause of nest failure for songbirds, yet information is lacking on the relative importance of predator species in different landscapes. We identified nest predators of Golden-cheeked Warblers (Dendroica chrysoparia) in an urban landscape, compared cause-specific mortality rates between urban and rural landscapes, and evaluated whether monitoring nests with cameras affected nest survival. We monitored 68 nests with cameras in Austin, Texas, during 2005, 2006, and 2008 to identify causes of mortality, including predators, in an urban landscape. The period mortality and predation rates were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.42-0.73) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68), respectively. We identified predators at 20 nests: Texas rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta lindheimerii) depredated eight nests (40%), Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica) depredated six (30%), Cooper's Hawks (Accipter cooperii) depredated two (10%), fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) depredated three (15%), and fire ants (Solenopsis sp.) depredated one nest (5%). We compared mortality rates, predation rates, and predators of the 68 camera-monitored nests in Austin to 74 nests monitored with cameras in the rural landscape of Fort Hood, Texas, during 1997-2002 and 2005. The period mortality rate (0.63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75), predation rate (0.59, 95% CI: 0.45- 0.73), and predator composition at Fort Hood were similar to those in Austin. Nest abandonment, hatching success, and nestling survival were also similar in both landscapes. We compared nest survival of the 68 camera-monitored nests to 62 active nests monitored without video cameras in Austin, period nest survival was slightly higher for camera-monitored nests (0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.58) than for nests without cameras (0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.54).
机译:捕食是鸣鸟筑巢失败的主要原因,但缺乏有关捕食者物种在不同景观中的相对重要性的信息。我们确定了城市景观中的金莺(Dendroica chrysoparia)的巢穴掠食者,比较了城乡景观之间特定原因的死亡率,并评估了用相机监视巢穴是否影响巢穴存活。我们在2005年,2006年和2008年期间使用相机在得克萨斯州奥斯汀监控了68个巢穴,以确定城市景观中的死亡原因,包括掠食者。期间死亡率和捕食率分别为0.60(95%CI:0.42-0.73)和0.52(95%CI:0.37-0.68)。我们在20个巢穴中发现了捕食者:德州老鼠蛇(Elaphe obsoleta lindheimerii)淘汰了8个巢穴(40%),Western Scrub-Jays(Aphelocoma californica)淘汰了6个巢穴(30%),库珀的鹰(Accipter cooperii)淘汰了两个巢穴(10%) ,狐狸松鼠(Sciurus niger)淘汰三只(15%),火蚁(Solenopsis sp。)淘汰一窝(5%)。我们比较了1997-2002年和2005年在奥斯丁的68个由相机监视的巢穴的死亡率,捕食率和天敌,与在德克萨斯州胡德堡乡村景观中用相机监视的74个巢穴的比较。该时期的死亡率(0.63,95 %Fort:CI(0.47-0.75),捕食率(0.59,95%CI:0.45- 0.73)和胡德堡的捕食者组成与奥斯丁相似。在这两个地区,巢舍的放弃,孵化成功和雏鸟的存活率也相似。我们将68个受相机监控的巢的生存期与62个未安装摄像机的活动巢的生存期进行了比较,相比之下,没有相机的巢的时期生存率(0.40,95%CI:0.22-0.58)略高于没有相机的巢( 0.37,95%CI:0.19-0.54)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号