首页> 外文期刊>The clinical journal of pain >Understand appropriate long-term use of opioids-seventeen years and counting.
【24h】

Understand appropriate long-term use of opioids-seventeen years and counting.

机译:了解适当的长期使用阿片类药物-17年并进行计数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Controversy continues among pain practitioners concerning the use of opioids for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain. This controversy is not new. Similar concerns and issues were voiced in the early 1990s. However, by the mid-1990s, professional and grass root efforts to promote improved palliative care and cancer pain control generalized to the noncancer pain arena and dampened the debate of these issues. More recently they have resurfaced, reinvigorated in part by popular press reports of opioid medication abuse and alleged practitioner misconduct.Much of this controversy stems from the limited evidence regarding the long-term benefits and hazards associated with daily opioid analgesic use. Seventeen years have passed since Turk and Brody identified some key research questions that might reduce or resolve concerns surrounding chronic opioid therapy. Yet, amazingly there remains a paucity of data regarding long-term opioid efficacy. In the absence of these data, providers must rely on whatever information is available to inform their clinical judgment, a situation unchanged from what was true in 1991.
机译:疼痛从业者之间关于使用阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的争论仍在继续。这个争议并不新鲜。在1990年代初也表达了类似的关切和问题。然而,到了1990年代中期,专业人士和基层人士为促进改善姑息治疗和癌症疼痛控制所做的努力普遍应用于非癌性疼痛领域,并削弱了对这些问题的争论。最近,他们因流行的阿片类药物滥用和据称从业人员行为不当的新闻报道而浮出水面,并在一定程度上振奋了他们的注意力,其中许多争议源于与日常使用阿片类镇痛药有关的长期益处和危害的有限证据。自Turk和Brody确定一些关键的研究问题以来,已经过去了17年,这些问题可能会减少或解决有关慢性阿片类药物治疗的担忧。然而,令人惊讶的是,关于长期阿片类药物疗效的数据仍然很少。在没有这些数据的情况下,提供者必须依靠可用的任何信息来进行临床判断,这种情况与1991年的情况相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号