首页> 外文期刊>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal: official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association >The americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.
【24h】

The americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.

机译:americleft研究:单侧唇left裂患者治疗结果的中心间研究。第4部分。鼻唇美学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the nasolabial aesthetics for individuals with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate between the ages of 5 and 12 years. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: Four cleft centers in North America. Subjects: A total of 124 subjects with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were treated at the four centers. Methods: After ethics approval was obtained, 124 preorthodontic frontal and profile patient images were scanned, cropped to show the nose and upper lip, and coded. Using the coded images, four nasolabial features that reflect aesthetics (i.e., nasal symmetry, nasal form, vermilion border, and nasolabial profile) were rated by five examiners using the rating system reported by Asher-McDade et al. (1991) . Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were determined using weighted kappa statistics. Mean ratings, by center, were compared using analysis of variance. Results: Intrarater reliability scores were good to very good and interrater reliability scores were moderate to good. Total nasolabial scores were Center B = 2.98, Center C = 3.02, Center D = 2.80, and Center E = 2.87. No statistically significant differences among centers were detected for both total aesthetic scores and for any of the individual aesthetic components. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in nasolabial aesthetics among the centers evaluated. Overall good to fair nasolabial aesthetic results were achieved using the different treatment protocols in the four North American centers.
机译:目的:比较年龄在5至12岁之间的非综合征性完全性单侧唇left裂患者的鼻唇美学。设计:回顾性横断面研究。地点:北美的四个裂口中心。受试者:共有124名受试者的四个单中心均已修复完全的单侧唇four裂。方法:获得伦理学批准后,扫描124例正畸前额和轮廓患者图像,裁剪以显示鼻子和上唇并进行编码。使用编码图像,五位检查员使用Asher-McDade等人报告的评级系统对反映美学的四个鼻唇特征(即鼻对称,鼻形,朱红色边框和鼻唇轮廓)进行了评级。 (1991)。使用加权kappa统计确定内部和内部的可靠性。使用方差分析比较按中心划分的平均评分。结果:Intrarater可靠性评分是良好到非常好,Interrater可靠性评分是中等到良好。鼻唇总得分为中心B = 2.98,中心C = 3.02,中心D = 2.80和中心E = 2.87。总体美学评分和任何单个美学成分均未检测到中心间的统计学差异。结论:所评估的中心之间的鼻唇美学没有显着差异。在北美的四个中心使用不同的治疗方案,获得了从总体到一般的鼻唇美学效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号