...
首页> 外文期刊>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal: official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association >Continuous bupivacaine infusion post-iliac crest bone graft harvesting in pediatric cleft surgery: role and comparison with ketorolac.
【24h】

Continuous bupivacaine infusion post-iliac crest bone graft harvesting in pediatric cleft surgery: role and comparison with ketorolac.

机译:小儿left裂手术中连续布比卡因输注-骨后植骨的收获:作用和与酮咯酸的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective : To investigate the use of intravenous ketorolac and iliac crest bupivacaine infusion in the management of iliac crest donor-site pain in the pediatric cleft population. The null hypothesis was there is no difference with respect to pain scores between ketorolac and iliac crest bupivacaine infusion as analgesic adjuncts to intravenous opioids. Methods : A total of 54 children and adolescents (27 boys, 27 girls) undergoing alveolar cleft repair or Le Fort I osteotomy were assigned randomly in a prospective, single-blinded fashion to one of three groups: intravenous ketorolac plus iliac crest normal saline infusion, intravenous ketorolac plus iliac crest bupivacaine infusion, or iliac crest bupivacaine infusion alone. Iliac crest infusions and ketorolac were administered for 48 hours or until discharge, whichever occurred first. All patients received morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Main Outcome Measure(s) : Primary outcome was pain score, and secondary outcomes were morphine consumption and satisfaction scores. Results : Pain scores, morphine consumption, and satisfaction scores were not significantly different among groups. Estimated costs were significantly higher for bupivacaine infusion than intravenous ketorolac. Conclusions : Iliac crest donor-site pain is well managed in this patient population. Intravenous ketorolac and iliac crest bupivacaine infusion provide comparable analgesia for iliac crest bone graft donor-site pain in children and adolescents.
机译:目的:探讨酮咯酸和顶布比卡因静脉输注在小儿left裂患者donor顶供体部位疼痛管理中的应用。零假设是在酮咯酸和顶布比卡因输注作为镇痛辅助剂与静脉内阿片类药物之间的疼痛评分方面没有差异。方法:以前瞻性,单盲方式将54例接受牙槽裂修补术或Le Fort I截骨术的儿童和青少年(27名男孩,27名女孩)随机分配至以下三组之一:静脉滴注酮咯酸加c波生理盐水,静脉酮咯酸加plus阿布比卡因输注,或alone加布比卡因单独输注。 lia c输注和酮咯酸给药48小时或直至出院,以先到者为准。所有患者均通过患者控制的镇痛设备接受吗啡。主要结果指标:主要结果是疼痛评分,次要结果是吗啡消费和满意度评分。结果:疼痛评分,吗啡消耗量和满意度评分在各组之间无显着差异。布比卡因输注的估计费用显着高于静脉注射酮咯酸。结论:在该患者人群中,I donor供体部位的疼痛得到了很好的控制。静脉注射酮咯酸和顶布比卡因输注可为儿童和青少年的comparable顶骨移植供体部位疼痛提供类似的镇痛作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号