...
首页> 外文期刊>The American mineralogist >Quantum mechanical vs. empirical potential modeling of uranium dioxide (UO2) surfaces: (111), (110), and (100)
【24h】

Quantum mechanical vs. empirical potential modeling of uranium dioxide (UO2) surfaces: (111), (110), and (100)

机译:二氧化铀(UO2)表面的量子力学与经验势模型:(111),(110)和(100)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To evaluate the stability, potential reactivity, and relaxation mechanisms on different uraninite surfaces, surface energy values were calculated and structural relaxation was determined for the (I 11), (110), and (100) crystallographic faces of uranium dioxide (UO2) using quantum mechanical (density functional theory) and empirical potential computational methods. Quantum mechanical results are compared with empirical potential results, which use surface slab models with two different geometries, as well as various different empirical force fields. The strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches are evaluated, and surface stabilizing mechanisms such as relaxation, charge redistribution, and electronic stabilization are investigated.
机译:为了评估在不同铀尿石表面上的稳定性,潜在的反应性和弛豫机理,计算了表面能值,并使用以下公式确定了二氧化铀(UO2)的(I 11),(110)和(100)结晶面的结构弛豫。量子力学(密度泛函理论)和经验势计算方法。将量子力学结果与经验势结果进行比较,后者使用具有两种不同几何形状以及各种不同经验力场的表面平板模型。评估了不同方法的优缺点,并研究了表面稳定机制,如弛豫,电荷重新分布和电子稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号