首页> 外文期刊>The cancer journal >Should patients with aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma all be treated the same?: No... well yes, ... but maybe not for long
【24h】

Should patients with aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma all be treated the same?: No... well yes, ... but maybe not for long

机译:侵袭性周围性T细胞淋巴瘤患者是否应全部接受相同治疗?:否...是的,...但可能不会持续很长时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The peripheral T-cell lymphomas represent about 15% to 20% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and are marked by clinical and pathologic heterogeneity. The most common T-cell entities include peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative, which account for approximately 60% of T-cell lymphoma cases. Because of the rarity of T-cell lymphomas and lack of randomized prospective studies, treatment for these diseases is not well defined. Current treatment strategies draw from data from phase II studies, retrospective analyses, and personal experience. For fit patients who can tolerate treatment with curative intent, we treat peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative similarly with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-based induction therapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant. Given the marked differences in histology, biology, and clinical presentation for these diseases, it is likely that they should be approached differently. Furthermore, prognostic factors and degree of chemosensitivity as measured by FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) should likely be used to guide patients along different treatment pathways. We have a long way to go toward perfecting the treatment for T-cell lymphoma. We believe that a uniform treatment approach for patients with aggressive T-cell lymphoma is not appropriate; however, we do not yet have enough data to support an individualized approach to treatment. Clinical and biologic prognostic factors, degree of chemosensitivity as measured by FDG-PET, and histology should all likely have a role in directing patients along different treatment pathways, but prospective studies are needed to confirm this.
机译:外周T细胞淋巴瘤约占非霍奇金淋巴瘤的15%至20%,并具有临床和病理学异质性。最常见的T细胞实体包括周围T细胞淋巴瘤(未另作说明),血管免疫母细胞T细胞淋巴瘤和间变性大细胞淋巴瘤,间变性淋巴瘤激酶阴性,约占T细胞淋巴瘤病例的60%。由于T细胞淋巴瘤的稀有性和缺乏随机的前瞻性研究,这些疾病的治疗方法尚不明确。当前的治疗策略来自II期研究,回顾性分析和个人经验的数据。对于可以耐受治愈性疾病的健康患者,我们将CHOP(环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和基于泼尼松的诱导治疗,然后合并自体干细胞移植。鉴于这些疾病的组织学,生物学和临床表现存在明显差异,因此应对它们的方式可能有所不同。此外,通过FDG-PET(氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像)测量的预后因素和化学敏感性程度应可用于指导患者采用不同的治疗途径。要完善T细胞淋巴瘤的治疗方法,我们还有很长的路要走。我们认为,对于侵袭性T细胞淋巴瘤患者采取统一的治疗方法是不合适的;但是,我们还没有足够的数据来支持个性化的治疗方法。临床和生物学预后因素,通过FDG-PET测量的化学敏感性程度以及组织学都可能在指导患者采用不同的治疗途径方面起作用,但是需要前瞻性研究来证实这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号