...
首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Local Anesthesia in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Improves Postoperative Quality of Life Compared to General Anesthesia: A Prospective, International Study
【24h】

Local Anesthesia in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Improves Postoperative Quality of Life Compared to General Anesthesia: A Prospective, International Study

机译:与全身麻醉相比,开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的局部麻醉可改善术后生活质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The choice of general (GA) versus local anesthesia (LA) in open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) has a substantial financial impact and may influence clinical outcomes. Our study compares postoperative quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing OIHR under LA versus GA. A cooperative prospective study from centers in 10 countries was performed through the International Hernia Mesh Registry from 2007 to 2012. QOL was compared at one, six, 12, and 24 months for LA versus GA with univariate and multivariate analysis controlling for known confounding variables. Of 1128 patients who underwent OIHR, 585(52%) used GA and 533(48%) used LA. Most were male (92%) with unilateral (94%), primary (91%) repairs with a mean age 57 6 16 years. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in age, gender, operative time, mesh size, length of stay, infection, recurrence, reoperation, or death. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant QOL differences between groups: GA had higher odds of discomfort at one and six months [odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 2.0], movement limitation at one and six months (OR 3.5,2.8), and mesh sensation at one and 12 months (OR 2.9,1.8). Overall, patients undergoing OIHR under LA had improved postoperative QOL in the short and long term compared with GA. The clinical comparison of anesthetic effect on inguinal hernia repair dates back to the 1900s when Harvey Cushing extolled the advantages of local anesthesia (LA) over general anesthesia (GA), "There is avoidance of the unpleasant or dangerous post-etherization sequelae. There is no vomiting or retching to put strain on recent sutures. Urinary disturbances are less apt to occur, and catheterization is rarely necessary. The diet continues as before the operation. [.] Above all is the advantage gained in being able to operate with comparative safety in patients who would incur immediate risk submitting to general anesthesia."
机译:开放性腹股沟疝修补术(OIHR)的全身(GA)与局部麻醉(LA)的选择具有重大的财务影响,并可能影响临床结果。我们的研究比较了在LA和GA下接受OIHR的患者的术后生活质量(QOL)。 2007年至2012年间,通过国际疝网格注册中心在10个国家的中心进行了一项合作的前瞻性研究。比较了LA,GA的QOL在1、6、12、24个月时的质量,并用单变量和多变量分析控制了已知的混杂变量。在接受OIHR的1128名患者中,有585名(52%)使用了GA,而有533名(48%)使用了LA。多数为男性(92%),单侧(94%),初次(91%)修补,平均年龄57 6 16岁。年龄,性别,手术时间,筛孔大小,住院时间,感染,复发,再次手术或死亡无差异(P> 0.05)。多变量分析表明两组之间存在明显的QOL差异:GA在1个月和6个月时出现不适的可能性更高[优势比(OR)3.3、2.0],在1个月和6个月时出现运动受限(OR 3.5,2.8)以及在1个月时出现网状感觉和12个月(或2.9,1.8)。总体而言,与GA相比,在LA下接受OIHR的患者的短期和长期术后QOL均有改善。麻醉对腹股沟疝修补效果的临床比较可以追溯到1900年代,当时Harvey Cushing赞扬了局部麻醉(LA)优于全身麻醉(GA)的优势,“避免了不愉快或危险的醚化后遗症。没有呕吐或呕吐,不会在最近的缝合线上施加压力;很少发生尿道疾病,很少需要导管插入;饮食与手术前一样继续进行。[。]最重要的是,能够以相对安全的方式进行手术那些因全身麻醉而有直接风险的患者。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号