...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series >Dielectronic recombination (via N=2 -> N '=2 core excitations) and radiative recombination of Fe XX: Laboratory measurements and theoretical calculations
【24h】

Dielectronic recombination (via N=2 -> N '=2 core excitations) and radiative recombination of Fe XX: Laboratory measurements and theoretical calculations

机译:Fe XX的双电子复合(通过N = 2-> N'= 2核激发)和辐射复合:实验室测量和理论计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We have measured the resonance strengths and energies for dielectronic recombination (DR) of Fe XX forming Fe XIX via N = 2 --> N' = 2 (DeltaN = 0) core excitations. We have also calculated the DR resonance strengths and energies using the AUTOSTRUCTURE, Hebrew University Lawrence Livermore Atomic Code (HULLAC), Multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock (MCDF), and R-matrix methods, four different state-of-the-art theoretical techniques. On average the theoretical resonance strengths agree to within less than or similar to10% with experiment. The AUTOSTRUCTURE, MCDF, and R-matrix results are in better agreement with experiment than are the HULLAC results. However, in all cases the 1 sigma standard deviation for the ratios of the theoretical-to-experimental resonance strengths is greater than or similar to30%, which is significantly larger than the estimated relative experimental uncertainty of less than or similar to10%. This suggests that similar errors exist in the calculated level populations and line emission spectrum of the recombined ion. We confirm that theoretical methods based on inverse-photoionization calculations (e.g., undamped R-matrix methods) will severely overestimate the strength of the DR process unless they include the effects of radiation damping. We also find that the coupling between the DR and radiative recombination (RR) channels is small. Below 2 eV the theoretical resonance energies can be up to approximate to30% larger than experiment. This is larger than the estimated uncertainty in the experimental energy scale (less than or similar to0.5% below approximate to25 eV and less than or similar to0.2% for higher energies) and is attributed to uncertainties in the calculations. These discrepancies makes DR of Fe XX an excellent case for testing atomic structure calculations of ions with partially filled shells. Above 2 eV, agreement between the theoretical and measured energies improves dramatically with the AUTOSTRUCTURE and MCDF results falling within 2% of experiment, the R-matrix results within 3%, and HULLAC within 5%. Agreement for all four calculations improves as the resonance energy increases. We have used our experimental and theoretical results to produce Maxwellian-averaged rate coefficients for DeltaN = 0 DR of Fe XX. For k(B)T(e) greater than or similar to 1 eV, which includes the predicted formation temperatures for Fe XX in an optically thin, low-density photoionized plasma with cosmic abundances, the experimental and theoretical results agree to better than approximate to15%. This is within the total estimated experimental uncertainty limits of less than or similar to20%. Agreement below approximate to1 eV is difficult to quantify due to current theoretical and experimental limitations. Agreement with previously published LS-coupling rate coefficients is poor, particularly for k(B)T(e) less than or similar to80 eV. This is attributed to errors in the resonance energies of these calculations as well as the omission of DR via 2p(1/2) - 2p(3/2) core excitations. We have also used our R-matrix results, topped off using AUTOSTRUCTURE for RR into J greater than or equal to 25 levels, to calculate the rate coefficient for RR of Fe XX. Our RR results are in good agreement with previously published calculations. We find that for temperatures as low as k(B)T(e) approximate to10(-3) eV, DR still dominates over RR for this system. [References: 58]
机译:我们已经测量了通过N = 2-> N'= 2(DeltaN = 0)的铁心激发形成Fe XIX的Fe XX的双电子复合(DR)的共振强度和能量。我们还使用自动结构,希伯来大学劳伦斯·利弗莫尔原子代码(HULLAC),多配置狄拉克-福克(MCDF)和R-矩阵方法(四种不同的最新理论技术)来计算DR共振强度和能量。平均而言,理论共振强度在实验中小于或等于10%以内。与HULLAC结果相比,AUTOSTRUCTURE,MCDF和R-matrix结果与实验更加吻合。但是,在所有情况下,理论与实验共振强度之比的1 sigma标准偏差都大于或相似于30%,这明显大于估计的相对实验不确定性小于或相似于10%。这表明在计算出的重组离子的能级数和线发射光谱中也存在类似的误差。我们确认,基于反光电离计算的理论方法(例如无阻尼R矩阵方法)将严重高估DR过程的强度,除非它们包括辐射衰减的影响。我们还发现DR和辐射重组(RR)通道之间的耦合很小。低于2 eV,理论共振能量可以比实验大约30%。这大于实验能量规模中的估计不确定性(对于大约25 eV,小于或等于0.5%,对于较高能量,小于或类似于0.2%),并且归因于计算中的不确定性。这些差异使Fe XX的DR成为测试具有部分填充壳的离子的原子结构计算的出色案例。高于2 eV时,自动结构和MCDF结果落在实验的2%之内,R矩阵结果在3%之内,HULLAC在5%之内,则理论能量与实测能量之间的一致性得到了显着改善。随着共振能量的增加,所有四个计算的一致性都会提高。我们已经使用我们的实验和理论结果来生成Fe XX的DeltaN = 0 DR的麦克斯韦平均速率系数。如果k(B)T(e)大于或等于1 eV,其中包括在具有宇宙丰度的光学稀薄,低密度光电离等离子体中Fe XX的预测形成温度,则实验和理论结果均优于近似值至15%。这在小于或接近20%的总估计实验不确定度范围内。由于当前的理论和实验局限性,低于约1 eV的一致性难以量化。与先前发布的LS耦合速率系数的一致性很差,尤其是对于k(B)T(e)小于或等于80 eV的情况。这归因于这些计算的共振能量的误差,以及由于2p(1/2)-2p(3/2)磁芯激励而导致的DR遗漏。我们还使用了R矩阵结果,并使用AUTOSTRUCTURE的RR将J填充到大于或等于25级的J中,以计算Fe XX的RR的速率系数。我们的RR结果与以前发布的计算非常吻合。我们发现,对于低至k(B)T(e)大约为10(-3)eV的温度,对于该系统,DR仍然胜过RR。 [参考:58]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号