【24h】

Classical wet ashing versus microwave-assisted attacks for the determination of chromium in plants

机译:经典的湿灰法与微波辅助法测定植物中的铬

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Microwave-assisted pre-treatments for the determination of Cr in plants are compared with classical wet-ashing procedures using open attacks in sand-baths. Four certified plant reference materials were analysed: pine needles (NIST SRM 1575), rye grass (BCR CRM 281), beech leaves (BCR CRM 100) and an aquatic plant (Ti apa natans) (BCR CRM 596). The use of acidic procedures with HClO4 or H2SO4 yielded different Cr results for these materials when classical wet-ashing procedures were used, as the use of HClO4 caused losses of volatile chromium compounds. The shorter time of analysis required (60 min) in open-focused microwave-assisted attack allows the use of HClO4 for obtaining results very close to the certified values for GRIM plant materials. This type of microwave digestion also led to good reproducibility values with relative standard deviations between 5 and 10%. [References: 22]
机译:将微波辅助测定植物中Cr的预处理方法与经典的湿法灰化程序(使用沙浴中的开放式侵蚀)进行了比较。分析了四种认证的植物参考材料:松针(NIST SRM 1575),黑麦草(BCR CRM 281),山毛榉叶(BCR CRM 100)和水生植物(Ti apa natans)(BCR CRM 596)。当使用传统的湿法灰化程序时,使用HClO4或H2SO4的酸性程序对这些材料产生不同的Cr结果,因为使用HClO4会导致挥发性铬化合物的损失。在集中聚焦微波辅助攻击中所需的分析时间较短(60分钟),因此可以使用HClO4获得非常接近GRIM植物材料认证值的结果。这种类型的微波消解还导致了良好的重现性值,相对标准偏差在5%和10%之间。 [参考:22]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号