首页> 外文期刊>The Analyst: The Analytical Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry: A Monthly International Publication Dealing with All Branches of Analytical Chemistry >An effective negative pressure cavitation-microwave assisted extraction for determination of phenolic compounds in P. calliantha H. Andr.
【24h】

An effective negative pressure cavitation-microwave assisted extraction for determination of phenolic compounds in P. calliantha H. Andr.

机译:一种有效的负压空化-微波辅助萃取法测定P. calliantha H. Andr。中的酚类化合物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A novel negative pressure and microwave assisted extraction technique (NMAE) was first proposed and applied for extraction of phenolic compounds from pyrola. [C_4MIM]BF_4 aqueous solution was selected as extraction solvent. Optimal extraction conditions were microwave power 700 W, negative pressure -0.07 MPa, temperature 40°C, liquid-solid ratio 20:1, ionic liquid (IL) concentration 0.5 M, extraction time 15 min. The predominance of NMAE was investigated by comparing with microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and negative pressure cavitation extraction (NPCE) using a first-order kinetics equation. The C_∞ values of the target compounds by NMAE were from 0.406 to 5.977 mg g~(-1) higher than these by MAE and NPCE, which indicated that NMAE had higher extraction yields. The K values of NMAE were also the highest; it was testified that the target compounds could be transferred from matrix into solvent much more effectively by NMAE than by MAE and NPCE. In addition, the NMAE method was validated in terms of repeatability and reproducibility, the relative standard deviation for relative recovery was lower than 5.43 and 8.78%, respectively. Therefore, NMAE was a developed extraction technique for analytical sample preparation. The RP-HPLC-UV method was also successfully applied for the quantification of six target compounds in pyrola.
机译:首次提出了一种新型的负压和微波辅助萃取技术(NMAE),并将其用于从吡咯中提取酚类化合物。选择[C_4MIM] BF_4水溶液作为萃取溶剂。最佳萃取条件为微波功率700 W,负压-0.07 MPa,温度40°C,液固比20:1,离子液体(IL)浓度0.5 M,萃取时间15分钟。使用一级动力学方程,通过与微波辅助萃取(MAE)和负压空化萃取(NPCE)进行比较,研究了NMAE的优势。 NMAE的目标化合物的C_∞值比MAE和NPCE的目标化合物的C_∞高0.406至5.977 mg g〜(-1),这表明NMAE的提取率更高。 NMAE的K值也最高;已证明,NMAE比MAE和NPCE能更有效地将目标化合物从基质转移到溶剂中。此外,NMAE方法在重复性和可重复性方面得到了验证,相对回收率的相对标准偏差分别低于5.43和8.78%。因此,NMAE是一种用于分析样品制备的先进提取技术。 RP-HPLC-UV方法也成功地用于定量测定吡咯中的六种目标化合物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号