...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Efficacy of waterless hand hygiene compared with handwashing with soap: a field study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
【24h】

Efficacy of waterless hand hygiene compared with handwashing with soap: a field study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

机译:与使用肥皂洗手相比,无水手卫生的功效:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的实地研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effective handwashing with soap requires reliable access to water supplies. However, more than three billion persons do not have household-level access to piped water. This research addresses the challenge of improving hand hygiene within water-constrained environments. The antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizer, a waterless hand hygiene product, was evaluated and compared with handwashing with soap and water in field conditions in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Hand sanitizer use by mothers resulted in 0.66 and 0.64 log reductions per hand of Escherichia coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. In comparison, handwashing with soap resulted in 0.50 and 0.25 log reductions per hand of E. coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. Hand sanitizer was significantly better than handwashing with respect to reduction in levels of fecal streptococci (P = 0.01). The feasibility and health impacts of promoting hand sanitizer as an alternative hand hygiene option for water-constrained environments should be assessed.
机译:用肥皂有效洗手需要可靠的供水。但是,超过30亿人无法从家庭一级获得自来水。这项研究解决了在缺水环境中改善手卫生的挑战。在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆,野外条件下评估了无水手卫生产品酒精类洗手液的抗菌功效,并将其与肥皂和水洗手进行了比较。母亲使用洗手液后,每只大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌的使用量分别减少了0.66和0.64 log。相比之下,用肥皂洗手每手大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌分别减少了0.50和0.25 log。就减少粪便链球菌水平而言,洗手液明显优于洗手液(P = 0.01)。应该评估在水受限的环境中推广洗手液作为替代手部卫生选择的可行性和健康影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号