首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Medicine and International Health: TM and IH >A community-randomised controlled trial promoting waterless hand sanitizer and handwashing with soap, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
【24h】

A community-randomised controlled trial promoting waterless hand sanitizer and handwashing with soap, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

机译:孟加拉国达卡市的一项社区随机对照试验,旨在推广无水洗手液和肥皂洗手。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To pilot two intensive hand hygiene promotion interventions, one using soap and one using a waterless hand sanitizer, in low-income housing compounds in Dhaka, Bangladesh and assess subsequent changes in handwashing behaviour and hand microbiology. METHODS: Fieldworkers randomized 30 housing compounds: 10 received handwashing promotion with free soap, 10 received handwashing promotion with free waterless hand sanitizer and 10 were non-intervention controls. Fieldworkers assessed handwashing behaviour by structured observation and collected hand rinse specimens. RESULTS: At baseline, compound residents washed their hands with soap 26% of the time after defecation and 30% after cleaning a child's anus but <1% at other times. Compared with baseline, residents of soap intervention compounds were much more likely to wash their hands with soap after faecal contact (85-91%), before preparing food (26%) and before eating (26%). Compounds that received waterless hand sanitizer cleansed their hands more commonly than control compounds that used soap (10.4%vs. 2.3%), but less commonly than soap intervention compounds used soap (25%). Post-intervention hand rinse samples from soap and sanitizer compounds had lower concentrations of faecal indicator bacteria compared with baseline and control compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Waterless hand sanitizer was readily adopted by this low-income community and reduced hand contamination but did not improve the frequency of handwashing compared with soap. Future deployments of waterless hand sanitizers may improve hand hygiene more effectively by targeting settings where soap and water is unavailable.
机译:目的:在孟加拉国达卡的低收入住房地区试行两种强化手部卫生的干预措施,一种使用肥皂,另一种使用无水洗手液,并评估随后的洗手行为和手微生物学变化。方法:现场工作人员随机分配了30种住房化合物:10例使用免费肥皂促进洗手,10例使用免费无水洗手液促进洗手,10例为非干预性对照。现场工作人员通过结构化观察评估洗手行为,并收集洗手样本。结果:在基线时,大便后排便后26%的时间和清洁儿童肛门后30%的时间,复合居民用肥皂洗手,其他时间<1%。与基线相比,肥皂干预化合物的居民在粪便接触后(85-91%),准备食物(26%)和进食前(26%)更容易用肥皂洗手。与使用肥皂的对照化合物(10.4%vs。2.3%)相比,使用无水洗手液的化合物清洁双手的频率更高,但不如使用肥皂的肥皂干预化合物(25%)更常见。与基线和对照化合物相比,干预后的肥皂和消毒剂化合物手洗样品的粪便指示菌浓度较低。结论:该低收入社区很容易采用无水洗手液,减少了手的污染,但与肥皂相比,洗手的频率没有提高。未来部署的无水洗手液可能会针对没有肥皂和水的环境,从而更有效地改善手部卫生状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号