首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: System review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: System review and meta-analysis

机译:开放式腹股沟疝修补术的自抓式网片与缝合式网片:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The objective of this article was to compare the outcomes of self-gripping mesh (GM) with sutured mesh (SM) in open inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were taken to compare the outcomes of GM and SM in open inguinal hernia repair. Results: A total of 1,353 patients in 6 randomized controlled trials and 2 observational studies were reviewed (666 patients in GM group; 687 patients in SM group). The 2 groups did not significantly differ in chronic groin pain (P =.23) or recurrence (P =.59). The operating time was significantly shorter in GM group (P <.00001). There was no significant difference in infection (P =.18), seromas (P =.35), hematomas (P =.87), or discomfort (P =.58) between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The data showed that GM was equivalent to SM in open inguinal hernia repair. However, this new mesh still needs to be confirmed in large, multi-center, well-designed randomized controlled trials.
机译:背景:本文的目的是比较开放式腹股沟疝修补术中自握式网片(GM)与缝合式网片(SM)的效果。方法:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较开放性腹股沟疝修补术中GM和SM的结果。结果:回顾了6项随机对照试验和2项观察性研究中的1,353例患者(GM组666例; SM组687例)。两组在慢性腹股沟疼痛(P = .23)或复发(P = .59)方面无显着差异。 GM组的手术时间明显缩短(P <.00001)。两组之间在感染(P = .18),血清肿(P = .35),血肿(P = .87)或不适(P = .58)方面无显着差异。结论:数据显示,在腹股沟疝的开放修补术中,GM等效于SM。但是,仍然需要在大型,多中心,设计良好的随机对照试验中确认这种新的网格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号