首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Medicine >A bridge too far: A critique of the new ACGME duty hour requirements
【24h】

A bridge too far: A critique of the new ACGME duty hour requirements

机译:过远的桥梁:对新ACGME工时要求的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The issue of resident work hours has been discussed extensively for more than 25 years. Errors and signs of sleep deprivation in residents have been catalogued in a few single institution studies with a limited number of residents and a modest number of observations. The results have been contradictory with some studies showing fewer errors with more mandated sleep time and one recent study showing increased length of stay and lower quality of care for patients with shorter duty shifts. Over recent years, resident on-call duty hours spent in the hospital have been progressively reduced in response to requirements imposed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), a non-governmental regulatory agency. These mandated changes in residency hours are being strictly enforced even though there is a remarkable paucity of outcomes data supporting these new rules.
机译:居民工作时间问题已被广泛讨论了25年以上。在少数几个机构研究中,居民数量有限且观察值不多,因此将居民睡眠不足的错误和体征分类。该结果与一些研究显示出更少的错误,更多的强制性睡眠时间是矛盾的,而最近的一项研究表明,对于工作时间较短的患者,其住院时间更长,护理质量更低。近年来,根据非政府监管机构研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的要求,医院在住院的待命值班时间已逐渐减少。尽管很少有支持这些新规则的结果数据,但仍严格执行这些居留时间的强制性更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号