首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie >Preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.
【24h】

Preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

机译:进行选择性结直肠手术的患者的术前肠道准备:这是加拿大结肠和直肠外科医生协会认可的临床实践指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) does not reduce the rate of postoperative complications, many surgeons still use MBP before surgery. We sought to appraise and synthesize the available evidence regarding preoperative bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patients who received a bowel preparation with those who did not. Two authors reviewed the abstracts to identify articles for critical appraisal. We used the methods of the United States Preventive Services Task Force to grade study quality and level of evidence, as well as formulate the final recommendations. Outcomes assessed included postoperative infectious complications, such as anastomotic dehiscence and superficial surgical site infections. RESULTS: Our review identified 14 RCTs and 8 meta-analyses. Based on the quality and content of these original manuscripts, we formulated 6 recommendations for various aspects of bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the lack of difference in postoperative infectious complication rates when MBP is omitted and the adverse effects of MBP, we believe that, based on the literature, MBP before surgery should be omitted.
机译:背景:尽管有证据表明机械肠准备(MBP)不能降低术后并发症的发生率,但许多外科医生仍在手术前使用MBP。我们试图评估和综合有关择期结直肠手术患者术前肠道准备的可用证据。方法:我们搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,以识别比较接受肠道准备和未接受肠道准备的患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者审阅了摘要,以识别要进行批判的文章。我们使用美国预防服务工作队的方法对研究质量和证据水平进行分级,并制定最终建议。评估的结果包括术后感染并发症,例如吻合口裂和浅表手术部位感染。结果:我们的审查确定了14项RCT和8项荟萃分析。基于这些原始手稿的质量和内容,我们针对选择性结直肠手术患者的肠道准备的各个方面制定了6条建议。结论:考虑到省略MBP时术后感染并发症的发生率没有差异以及MBP的不良反应,我们认为,根据文献,我们应省略手术前的MBP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号