...
首页> 外文期刊>Technometrics >Adjustment of Measuring Devices With Linear Models
【24h】

Adjustment of Measuring Devices With Linear Models

机译:用线性模型调整测量装置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We consider the problem of linear calibration or adjustment of two measuring devices based on a sample of replicated measurements. Linear adjustments are routinely used in the pavement industry. A simple solution based on linear regression of the average measurements of one device on the other has been used by field engineers. To address the statistical concern that the regression parameter estimates are biased due to attenuation, we consider a more sophisticated multivariate model to obtain asymptotically unbiased estimates of the calibration parameters. The maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the multivariate model are computed with the EM algorithm. Simulation studies and asymptotic calculations are used to compare properties of the MLE with the simple regression method. Data from two measuring devices used for determining asphalt pavement density, coring and nuclear gauge, are used in an example. We find that the superiority in parameter estimation of the MLE does not always result in better adjustments. In typical applications, such as determining pavement density, the simple regression method is highly competitive and often performs better than the multivariate MLE in adjusting the measurements from a cruder device despite its bias problem.
机译:我们考虑基于重复测量样本的两个测量设备的线性校准或调整问题。线性调整通常在路面行业中使用。现场工程师已经使用了一种基于一种设备另一种设备的平均测量值的线性回归的简单解决方案。为了解决由于衰减导致回归参数估计值有偏差的统计问题,我们考虑使用更复杂的多元模型来获得渐近无偏的校准参数估计值。用EM算法计算多元模型的最大似然估计(MLE)。仿真研究和渐近计算用于将MLE的属性与简单回归方法进行比较。在一个示例中,使用了来自两个用于确定沥青路面密度的测量设备的数据(取芯和核规)。我们发现,MLE的参数估计优势并不总是导致更好的调整。在典型的应用中(例如确定路面密度),尽管存在偏差问题,但简单的回归方法仍具有很高的竞争力,并且在调整较粗设备的测量值时,其性能优于多元MLE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号