首页> 外文期刊>Technovation: The International Journal of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Management >Does the nano-patent 'Gold rush' lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan
【24h】

Does the nano-patent 'Gold rush' lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan

机译:纳米专利的“淘金热”会导致企业家驱动的增长吗?中国和日本的一些政策教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study we compare the nano-patent landscapes of China and Japan in order to assess how their structures (type, fragmentation and concentration of patent ownership) affect the organization of the nanotechnology industry. We also analyze technology policy in order to assess how these interventions support technology transfer and nano-exploitation through university-industry collaboration and technology entrepreneurship. Drawing upon 20,365 patent families related to carbon nanotubes from 1994 to present, we found that two dissimilar technology policies boosting national innovation system emerged: China is more focused on forging an anchor-tenant model, while Japan exhibits a more industry-oriented model through demand-side policy intervention. Implications for firms' strategies and policy makers are discussed.
机译:在本研究中,我们比较了中国和日本的纳米专利景观,以评估其结构(专利所有权的类型,碎片和集中程度)如何影响纳米技术产业的组织。我们还分析技术政策,以评估这些干预措施如何通过大学与产业界的合作以及技术企业家精神来支持技术转让和纳米开发。从1994年至今的20365个与碳纳米管相关的专利家族中,我们发现出现了两种促进国家创新体系发展的不同技术政策:中国更加专注于打造固定租户模型,而日本则通过需求展现出更加面向产业的模型方面的政策干预。讨论了对企业战略和决策者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号