首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of surgery: Journal canadien de chirurgie >Equity in waiting times for major joint arthroplasty.
【24h】

Equity in waiting times for major joint arthroplasty.

机译:大关节置换术的等待时间公平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether waiting lists are managed in an equitable fashion in a universal health system by examining demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors, along with 2 health systems variables. DESIGN: A prospective survey by questionnaire. SETTING: The Capital Health Region of Edmonton, Alta. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 553 patients, who were waiting for either total hip or total knee replacement surgery, seen between Dec. 18, 1995, and Jan. 24, 1997. INTERVENTIONS: A home visit was made when the patient was first placed on the waiting list and again just before surgery to complete the questionnaires. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) instrument and the Medication Quantification Score were administered at the time the patient was placed on the waiting list. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The length of waiting time, defined as the date the patient was put on the waiting list to the date the patient was operated on. RESULTS: There were no biases in waiting time with respect to age, gender, education or work status. Although pain and function were not related to waiting time, multivariate analyses found that marital status, primary language, body mass index, pain medication use and the size of the surgeons' major joint replacement practice determined waiting time for surgery. However, this model explained only 10% of the variance in waiting time. CONCLUSION: Waiting lists were managed unfairly in terms of clinical equity (clinical severity) but managed fairly in terms of social equity.
机译:目的:通过检查人口统计,社会经济和临床因素以及两个卫生系统变量,确定在全民卫生系统中是否以公平的方式管理候补名单。设计:通过问卷进行的前瞻性调查。地点:阿尔塔埃德蒙顿首都卫生区。患者与方法:队列研究的553名患者正在等待全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术,于1995年12月18日至1997年1月24日之间进行。干预:患者首次住院时进行了一次家庭访视。放置在等待名单上,并在手术前再次填写问卷。在患者被列入候补名单时,管理了安大略省西部和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)的仪器和药物量化分数。主要观察指标:等待时间的长短,定义为患者被列入等待名单的日期至患者接受手术的日期。结果:关于年龄,性别,教育程度或工作状态的等待时间没有偏见。尽管疼痛和功能与等待时间无关,但多元分析发现,婚姻状况,主要语言,体重指数,止痛药的使用以及外科医生主要的关节置换手术的规模决定了手术的等待时间。但是,该模型仅解释了等待时间差异的10%。结论:候诊名单在临床公平性(临床严重性)方面受到不公平的管理,但在社会公平性方面进行了公平的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号