...
首页> 外文期刊>Pathogens and global health >Intravenous artesunate versus intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria: A retrospective evaluation from a UK centre
【24h】

Intravenous artesunate versus intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria: A retrospective evaluation from a UK centre

机译:青蒿琥酯静脉注射奎宁与静脉注射奎宁治疗严重恶性疟疾:英国中心的回顾性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Despite evidence from developing world trials that intravenous (IV) artesunate (AS) is superior to IV quinine (Q) in severe falciparum malaria (FM), IV AS remains unlicensed in the UK with national guidelines listing it as an acceptable alternative to IV Q as the drug of choice. We retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IV AS in returning travellers with severe FM. Methods: We identified adults admitted to the Infectious Diseases unit with severe FM and treated with IV Q (1991-2009) or IV AS (2009-2011). Outcomes included adverse events, mortality, length of stay, admission to intensive care and, where data were available, parasite/fever clearance time and hypoglycaemic events. Results: Of 167 patients, 24 received IV AS and 143 IV Q. There was one potential AS-associated adverse event, a case of late onset haemolysis. Median length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter for AS (3.5 versus 5 days, P50.017), even after adjusting for African ethnicity (for LOS >3 days, mhor50.33, P50.027; crude OR50.29, P50.013). In the AS group, there were no fatalities (versus five in Q group, NS) and fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (NS). Median parasite clearance was significantly faster in AS (65 versus 85 hours in Q, P50.0045) with no hypoglycaemic episodes (versus five in Q). Discussion: We found IV AS to be safe and effective, with shorter LOS, faster parasite and fever clearance, no fatalities or hypoglycaemic events, and fewer ICU admissions versus IV Q. This corroborates both developing world trials and smaller European case series (although these lacked comparison groups). As well as obvious benefits for patients, there are potential resource savings. A case of late-onset haemolysis may represent an adverse event, particularly as it has been documented elsewhere, warranting further investigation. Nonetheless, our experience suggests IV AS should be first-line for treating severe FM in the UK.
机译:简介:尽管有来自发展中国家的试验证据表明,严重的恶性疟疾(FM)中静脉注射青蒿琥酯(AS)优于IV奎宁(Q),但英国仍未获得IV AS的许可,国家指南将其列为可接受的替代品IV Q作为首选药物。我们回顾性评估IV AS在重度FM回程旅客中的安全性和有效性。方法:我们确定了进入传染病科的重度FM并接受IV Q(1991-2009)或IV AS(2009-2011)治疗的成年人。结果包括不良事件,死亡率,住院时间,接受重症监护,以及在可获得数据的情况下,寄生虫/发热清除时间和降血糖事件。结果:在167例患者中,有24例接受了IV AS和143例IVQ。存在一种潜在的与AS相关的不良事件,即迟发性溶血。即使对非洲人族进行了调整(LOS> 3天,mhor50.33,P50.027;粗OR50.29,P50),AS的中位住院时间(LOS)也显着缩短(3.5天比5天,P50.017)。 .013)。在AS组中,没有死亡(相对于Q组中的5人),重症监护病房(ICU)的住院人数也更少。在AS中,没有降血糖发作的中位寄生虫清除明显更快(Q为65相对85小时,P50.0045)(Q为5)。讨论:与IV Q相比,我们发现IV AS是安全有效的,具有较短的LOS,更快的寄生虫和发烧清除率,无致命性或降血糖事件,且ICU住院率更低。这证实了发展中国家的临床试验和较小的欧洲病例系列(尽管缺少比较组)。除了为患者带来明显好处之外,还可以节省资源。迟发性溶血可能是一种不良事件,特别是因为它在其他地方已有记录,有待进一步调查。但是,我们的经验表明,IV AS应该是英国治疗严重FM的一线药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号