首页> 外文期刊>Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry >Resolution of multicomponent overlapped peaks - A comparison of several curve resolution methods
【24h】

Resolution of multicomponent overlapped peaks - A comparison of several curve resolution methods

机译:多组分重叠峰的拆分-几种曲线拆分方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

several curve resolution methods were compared in their performance of identification and quantification of overlapping peaks. These resolution methods are heuristic evolving latent projections (HELP), sub-window factor analysis (SFA), and orthogonal projection resolution (OPR). In this paper, HELP, SFA and CPR with the rank map produced by evolving factor analysis (EFA) or fixed size moving window-evolving factor analysis (FSMW-EFA) were applied to the simulated and experimental data. The resolved results were compared qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition, the further comparison was carried out with the results obtained from multivariate curve resolution-alternate least square (MCR-ALS) by using the initial estimates provided by EFA. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:比较了几种曲线拆分方法在识别和定量重叠峰方面的性能。这些解决方法是启发式演化潜在投影(HELP),子​​窗口因子分析(SFA)和正交投影分辨率(OPR)。在本文中,将通过演化因子分析(EFA)或固定大小移动窗口演化因子分析(FSMW-EFA)生成的等级图的HELP,SFA和CPR应用于模拟和实验数据。解决方案的结果进行了定性和定量比较。此外,通过使用EFA提供的初始估算,对多变量曲线分辨率-最小二乘(MCR-ALS)获得的结果进行了进一步的比较。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号