...
首页> 外文期刊>Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry >Detection of adulteration in hydrated ethyl alcohol fuel using infrared spectroscopy and supervised pattern recognition methods
【24h】

Detection of adulteration in hydrated ethyl alcohol fuel using infrared spectroscopy and supervised pattern recognition methods

机译:红外光谱和监督模式识别方法检测水合乙醇燃料中的掺假

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper proposes an analytical method to detect adulteration of hydrated ethyl alcohol fuel based on near infrared (NIR) and middle infrared (MIR) spectroscopies associated with supervised pattern recognition methods. For this purpose, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was employed to build a classification model on the basis of a reduced subset of wavenumbers. For variable selection, three techniques are considered, namely the successive projection algorithm (SPA), the genetic algorithm (GA) and a stepwise formulation (SW). For comparison, models based on partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were also employed using full-spectrum. The method was validated in a case study involving the classification of 181 hydrated ethyl alcohol fuel samples, which were divided into three different classes: (1) authentic samples; (2) samples adulterated with water and (3) samples contaminated with methanol. LDA/GA and PLS-DA models were found to be the best methods for classifying the spectral data obtained in NIR region, which achieved a correct prediction rate of 100% in the test set, while the LDA/SPA and LDA/SW were correctly classified at 84.4% and 97.8%, respectively. For MIR data, all models (PLS-DA and LDA coupled with the SW, SPA and GA) employed in this study correctly classified all samples in the test set.
机译:本文提出了一种基于监督模式识别方法的近红外(NIR)和中红外(MIR)光谱学检测水合乙醇燃料掺假的分析方法。为此,线性判别分析(LDA)用于基于减少的波数子集建立分类模型。对于变量选择,考虑了三种技术,即连续投影算法(SPA),遗传算法(GA)和逐步公式(SW)。为了进行比较,还使用了基于全光谱的偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)模型。该方法在涉及181个水合乙醇燃料样品分类的案例研究中得到验证,该样品分为三类:(1)真实样品; (2)掺入水的样品和(3)被甲醇污染的样品。发现LDA / GA和PLS-DA模型是对在NIR区域中获得的光谱数据进行分类的最佳方法,在测试集中实现了100%的正确预测率,而LDA / SPA和LDA / SW是正确的分别为84.4%和97.8%。对于MIR数据,本研究中使用的所有模型(PLS-DA和LDA以及SW,SPA和GA)正确地将测试集中的所有样本分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号