...
首页> 外文期刊>Techniques in coloproctology >A randomised controlled trial of transverse skin crease vs. vertical midline incision for right hemicolectomy.
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of transverse skin crease vs. vertical midline incision for right hemicolectomy.

机译:右半结肠切除术横向皮肤折痕与垂直中线切口的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: A transverse skin crease incision for right hemicolectomy may result in more rapid recovery than traditional vertical midline incision. This hypothesis was tested with a prospective randomised trial. METHODS: Patients from 2 centres undergoing right hemicolectomy were randomised to received a midline or transverse incision. Incision lengths were sufficient to enable unrestricted resection of the right colon. Patients and carers were blinded to the incisions using strategically placed dressings. Analgesia and oral intake were controlled by the patient. Operative details and recovery parameters were compared. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were randomised. Demographic data and tumour characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. The transverse incision group had a slightly shorter median wound (10 cm vs. 11 cm, p<0.05). Operative time, analgesia requirements, recovery parameters (time to discharge, 6.5 vs. 6.5 days) and frequency of complications were otherwise comparable. CONCLUSIONS: A transverse skin crease incision for right hemicolectomy results in a slightly smaller wound but no other advantages were demonstrated compared with a traditional vertical midline incision.
机译:背景:用于右半结肠切除术的皮肤横向折痕切口可能比传统的垂直中线切口切口恢复更快。该假设已通过前瞻性随机试验进行了检验。方法:将来自两个中心接受右半结肠切除术的患者随机分为中线或横向切口。切口的长度足以使右结肠不受限制地切除。使用策略性放置的敷料使患者和护理人员看不到切口。镇痛和口服摄入量由患者控制。比较手术细节和恢复参数。结果:总共28例患者被随机分组​​。两个治疗组的人口统计学数据和肿瘤特征相似。横向切口组的中位伤口稍短(10 cm vs. 11 cm,p <0.05)。手术时间,镇痛要求,恢复参数(出院时间,分别为6.5天和6.5天)和并发症发生频率是可比较的。结论:右半结肠切除术采用皮肤横向皱纹切口可以使伤口稍小,但与传统的垂直中线切口相比,没有其他优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号