首页> 外文期刊>Urologic oncology >Comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy policies for postprostatectomy radiotherapy Hagan M, Zlotecki R, Medina C, Tercilla O, Rivera I, Wajsman Z, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Univer
【24h】

Comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy policies for postprostatectomy radiotherapy Hagan M, Zlotecki R, Medina C, Tercilla O, Rivera I, Wajsman Z, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Univer

机译:前列腺癌术后放疗的辅助放疗策略与挽救性放疗策略的比较Hagan M,Zlotecki R,Medina C,Tercilla O,Rivera I,Wajsman Z,弗吉尼亚医学院的放射肿瘤学系,弗吉尼亚联邦大学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: We compared the long-term results of postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) from two institutions, one adapting a prospective policy of adjuvant RT and the other salvage RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1989 and 1997, 69 patients were referred for adjuvant RT to the institution using adjuvant RT and 88 patients with evidence of recurrence were treated in the institution using salvage RT. The salvage group underwent RT after longer postoperative intervals (median, 40.3 vs. 2.9 months; p < 0.0001) and had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values before starting RT (4.5 vs. 0.86 ng/mL; p = 0.003). Both groups were routinely treated to a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. The treatment groups were analyzed for overall survival, disease-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) using Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients referred for adjuvant RT, 22 (32%) had nonzero PSA values before RT. Multivariable modeling of BRFS found only the PSA value before RT to be statistically significant (p < 0.0001). RT after prostatectomy was equally effective in either setting when the pre-RT PSA level was <1 ng/mL. When the PSA value before RT was 1 ng/mL, the 5-year BRFS for each group was inferior. CONCLUSION: Although the adjuvant treatment policy was associated with significantly improved BRFS, this was attributable to low pre-RT PSA values. When the treatment groups were stratified for pre-RT PSA level, the differences in BRFS were not statistically significant. Patients with a rising PSA level after prostatectomy, regardless of their initial risk, should receive prompt referral for RT.
机译:目的:我们比较了两个机构的前列腺切除术后放疗(RT)的长期结果,一个采用适应性辅助放疗的前瞻性策略,另一个采用挽救性RT。方法和材料:在1989年至1997年之间,有69例患者接受了辅助性RT的辅助放疗,其中88例有复发证据的患者接受了挽救性RT的治疗。挽救组在较长的术后间隔后进行了放疗(中位值:40.3 vs. 2.9个月; p <0.0001),并且在开始放疗前具有较高的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值(4.5 vs. 0.86 ng / mL; p = 0.003)。两组均常规治疗至最小总剂量为60 Gy。使用Cox比例风险模型分析了治疗组的总生存期,疾病特异性生存期,无远处转移生存期和无生化复发生存期(BRFS)。结果:在接受辅助放疗的69例患者中,有22例(32%)的放疗前PSA值非零。 BRFS的多变量建模仅发现RT之前的PSA值具有统计学意义(p <0.0001)。当RT-PSA前水平<1 ng / mL时,前列腺切除术后的RT在这两种情况下同样有效。当RT之前的PSA值为1 ng / mL时,每组的5年BRFS均较差。结论:尽管辅助治疗策略与BRFS明显改善有关,但这归因于RT前PSA值低。当治疗组按RT-PSA前水平分层时,BRFS的差异无统计学意义。前列腺切除术后PSA水平升高的患者,无论其初始风险如何,均应立即转诊接受RT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号