首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Prosthetic mesh hernioplasty during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Prosthetic mesh hernioplasty during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

机译:腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的人工网状疝修补术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of simultaneous laparoscopic mesh prosthetic hernioplasty during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), because 5% to 10% of candidates for radical prostatectomy present with a detectable inguinal hernia at their preoperative physical examination. Moreover, data have suggested a greater incidence of inguinal hernia after open radical prostatectomy. METHODS: During 1035 LRP procedures, 50 laparoscopic mesh prosthetic hernioplasty procedures were performed in 37 patients (3.6%) for 13 bilateral and 24 unilateral inguinal hernias. We compared the outcome of LRP with simultaneous laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (group 1) with that of 37 match-paired patients treated by LRP alone (group 2). Both groups were matched according to age, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, pathologic stage, and Gleason score. Perioperative parameters (ie, operative time, analgesic requirements) and postoperative results were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient age was 64.1 +/- 6.4 years versus 62.8 +/- 4.9 years old and had a body mass of 26.5 +/- 3.0 versus 27.4 +/- 3.2 kg/m2 in groups 1 and 2 (with and without laparoscopic hernioplasty), respectively. The mean operating time (221.9 versus 191.2 minutes, P = 0.011) and the total amount of narcotic analgesic requirements (26.8 mg versus 17.5 mg, P = 0.026) was significantly increased in the patients who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair. No statistically significant difference was found in the complication rate (4% versus 2%), median catheter time (7 days), and positive surgical margins (21.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous repair of inguinal hernia during LRP using prosthetic mesh is feasible without adverse effects on surgical and functional parameters. Neither the transperitoneal nor extraperitoneal approach is associated with an increase in complications or morbidity. However, an extraperitoneal access allows an easier repair without the refixation of the peritoneum.
机译:目的:要评估在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(LRP)的同时进行腹腔镜网状假体疝成形术的作用,因为在进行术前体检时,有5%至10%的前列腺癌根治术患者存在可检测的腹股沟疝。此外,有数据表明开放式前列腺癌根治术后腹股沟疝的发生率更高。方法:在1035 LRP手术中,对37例患者(3.6%)进行了50例腹腔镜网状假体疝修补术,治疗了13例双侧和24例单侧腹股沟疝。我们比较了腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术同时进行LRP的结果(组1)与仅接受LRP治疗的37对配对患者(组2)的结果。两组根据年龄,前列腺特异性抗原水平,前列腺体积,病理分期和格里森评分进行匹配。分析围手术期参数(即手术时间,镇痛要求)和术后结果。结果:患者年龄为64.1 +/- 6.4岁,而年龄为62.8 +/- 4.9岁,体重分别为26.5 +/- 3.0和27.4 +/- 3.2 kg / m2(有和没有腹腔镜)疝成形术)。在同时进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝气网修补术的患者中,平均手术时间(221.9比191.2分钟,P = 0.011)和麻醉镇痛剂的总量(26.8 mg比17.5 mg,P = 0.026)显着增加。并发症发生率(4%对2%),中位导管时间(7天)和手术切缘阳性(21.8%)均无统计学差异。结论:使用假体网在LRP术中同时修补腹股沟疝是可行的,并且不会对手术和功能参数产生不利影响。腹膜外或腹膜外方法均不会增加并发症或发病率。但是,腹膜外通道可在不固定腹膜的情况下更容易修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号