首页> 外文期刊>Urology >A posterior lumbar approach for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: assessment of surgical efficacy.
【24h】

A posterior lumbar approach for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: assessment of surgical efficacy.

机译:腰椎后路腹膜后肾上腺切除术:评估手术疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy by a posterior lumbar approach (RPA) with that obtained by a transperitoneal anterior approach (TAA) or retroperitoneal lateral flank approach (RLA). METHODS: Fifty-one patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy by three approaches, including laparoscopic adrenalectomy by TAA in 33, retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy by RLA in 5, and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy by RPA in 13. RESULTS: The average adrenal tumor size was 27 mm (range 8 to 65). The average number of trocars required for RPA was 3.2 which was significantly less than that for TAA and for RLA (4.2 and 4.1, respectively). The conversion rate to open surgery was 9.1% by TAA, 0% by RLA, and 7.7% by RPA. The average operating time for TAA was 252 minutes, which was significantly shortened to 194 minutes by RLA and 142 minutes by RPA (P < 0.02). The average blood loss was 101 mL for TAA and was negligible by RLA and RPA (22 and 32 mL. respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RPA allowed direct access to the main adrenal vascular supply before the gland was greatly manipulated. Endoscopic adrenalectomy by TAA or even by RLA required extra ports for retraction of liver, spleen, vena cava, or adrenal gland, with higher chance of vein avulsion. RPA was technically feasible and most effective for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in regard to the simplicity of vascular control. The operating time, perioperative morbidity, and cost were reduced with this approach.
机译:目的:比较后路腰椎入路(RPA)与经腹膜前路入路(TAA)或腹膜后侧腹后路入路(RLA)获得的腹膜后镜肾上腺切除术的疗效。方法:51例患者通过三种方法进行了内镜肾上腺切除术,包括33例行TAA腹腔镜肾上腺切除术,5例行RLA腹腔镜肾上腺切除术,13例行RPA腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。结果:平均肾上腺肿瘤大小为27毫米(范围从8到8)。 65)。 RPA所需的平均套管针数量为3.2,大大少于TAA和RLA的平均数量(分别为4.2和4.1)。 TAA的开腹手术转化率为9.1%,RLA的转化率为0%,RPA的转化率为7.7%。 TAA的平均运行时间为252分钟,RLA显着缩短为194分钟,RPA显着缩短为142分钟(P <0.02)。 TAA的平均失血量为101毫升,而RLA和RPA(分别为22和32毫升)可以忽略不计。结论:RPA可以直接进入主要的肾上腺血管供应,然后再对腺体进行大量操作。通过TAA或什至通过RLA进行内窥镜肾上腺切除术需要额外的端口来撤回肝,脾,腔静脉或肾上腺,静脉撕脱的机会更高。就简化血管控制而言,RPA在腹腔镜后肾上腺切除术上在技术上是可行的并且最有效。这种方法减少了手术时间,围手术期发病率和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号