...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence.
【24h】

Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence.

机译:前列腺癌根治术后的吻合口狭窄:深入了解发病率,干预效果,对节制的影响以及易发因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to the occurrence of anastomotic strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. METHODS: Between January 1994 and June 1999, 753 radical retropubic prostatectomies were performed by a single surgeon. Anastomotic strictures were managed by dilatation followed by a self-catheterization regimen. Dilatations were repeated unless more than three dilatations were required over a 9-month interval. A control group representing a randomly selected group of men who did not develop anastomotic strictures was identified. The largest width of the midline vertical abdominal scar was measured. RESULTS: Of the 753 radical retropubic prostatectomies, 36 (4.8%) developed an anastomotic stricture. The mean time interval between the surgical procedure and diagnosis of the stricture was 4.22 months. Of the 26 cases of anastomotic strictures with at least 1-year follow-up, 24 (92.3%) were managed successfully by dilatations alone. No baseline characteristics before surgery were associated with the development of a stricture. The maximal scar width was the only factor that was associated with the development of a stricture in this study. Men with a maximal scar of greater than 10 mm were eight times more likely to develop strictures than men with smaller scars. The percentage of men who required protective pads 1 year following radical retropubic prostatectomy in the control and stricture groups was 12.5% and 46.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic strictures are relatively rare following radical prostatectomy and have a negative effect on the development of continence. Most men are successfully managed with dilatations alone. The development of anastomotic strictures in some men appears to be related to a generalized hypertrophic wound-healing mechanism.
机译:目的:研究根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后发生吻合口狭窄的发生率,干预效果,节制效果和诱发因素。方法:1994年1月至1999年6月,由一位外科医生进行了753例根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术。吻合口狭窄是通过扩张,然后进行自我导尿的方案来处理的。重复扩张,除非在9个月的间隔内需要进行三个以上的扩张。确定了一个代表随机选择的一组没有发生吻合口狭窄的男性的对照组。测量中线垂直腹部瘢痕的最大宽度。结果:在753例根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术中,有36例(4.8%)发生了吻合口狭窄。从手术到狭窄诊断的平均时间间隔为4.22个月。在至少一年随访中的26例吻合口狭窄病例中,仅通过扩张术成功治愈了24例(92.3%)。术前没有基线特征与狭窄的发展有关。在本研究中,最大疤痕宽度是与狭窄发展有关的唯一因素。最大疤痕大于10毫米的男人比小疤痕的男人出现狭窄的可能性高八倍。对照组和狭窄组中,耻骨后前列腺癌根治术后1年需要保护垫的男性比例分别为12.5%和46.2%。结论:根治性前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄相对少见,对节制发展有负面影响。大多数男人仅通过扩张就可以成功治疗。在某些男性中,吻合口狭窄的发展似乎与普遍的肥大性伤口愈合机制有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号