首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Should Gleason score 7 prostate cancer be considered a unique grade category?
【24h】

Should Gleason score 7 prostate cancer be considered a unique grade category?

机译:格里森评分7的前列腺癌是否应被视为独特的年级类别?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pathologic characteristics and biochemical survival rate differences between patients with Gleason score 6 or less, 7, and 8 or more prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 652 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer between March 1991 and December 1995 were selected for this study. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Clinical and pathologic data were obtained from our prostate cancer data base. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pathologic stage, and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed between the three Gleason score groups. RESULTS: The overall mean pretreatment serum PSA level was 12.9 ng/mL, being 8.4, 13.4, and 23 ng/mL for Gleason score 6 or less, 7, and 8 or more prostate cancers, respectively (P = 0.0001). Of patients with specimen Gleason score 6 or less, 7, and 8 or more, pathologic organ-confined disease was present in 69.4%, 43.1 %, and 9.2%, respectively (P = 0.001). Extraprostatic extension was present in 30.6%, 56.9%, and 90.8% (P = 0.0001); positive surgical margins, considered independently from the other pathologic findings, were present in 31 %, 47.6%, and 67.8% of patients with Gleason score 6 or less, 7, and 8 or more, respectively (P = 0.0001). DFS was 34.5% for patients with Gleason score 8 or more, 75% for Gleason score 7, and 91.2% for Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancers, at a median follow-up of 34.2 months (P = 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for serum PSA level (10 or less or more than 10 ng/mL) and pathologic stage, Gleason score (6 or less, 7, 8 or more) remained a statistically significant predictor of DFS (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer should be considered a specific prognostic category. We believe that this distinction is critical to obtain more reliable results from prostate cancer analyses about prognosis of patients treated with curative intent.
机译:目的:评估格里森评分为6或更低,7和8或更高的前列腺癌患者的病理特征和生化生存率差异。方法:本研究共选择了1991年3月至1995年12月间因临床局限性前列腺癌行根治性前列腺切除术的652例患者。排除接受新辅助或辅助激素治疗或放疗的患者。临床和病理数据来自我们的前列腺癌数据库。在三个格里森评分组之间分析了血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平,病理分期和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:治疗前血清PSA的总体平均平均水平为12.9 ng / mL,格里森评分为6分以下,7分和8分以上的前列腺癌分别为8.4、13.4和23 ng / mL(P = 0.0001)。 Gleason评分为6分以下,7分和8分以上的患者中,病理性局限性疾病分别占69.4%,43.1%和9.2%(P = 0.001)。前列腺外延伸率分别为30.6%,56.9%和90.8%(P = 0.0001); Gleason评分分别为6或以下,7和8或以上的患者中,分别有31%,47.6%和67.8%的患者出现了与其他病理结果无关的手术切缘阳性(P = 0.0001)。对于Gleason评分8或更高的患者,DFS为34.5%,Gleason评分7的患者为75%,Gleason评分6或更低的前列腺癌为91.2%,中位随访时间为34.2个月(P = 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,在调整血清PSA水平(10或更低或超过10 ng / mL)和病理分期后,格里森评分(6或更低,7、8或更高)仍然是DFS的统计学显着预测因子(P = 0.0001 )。结论:格里森评分为7的前列腺癌患者应被视为特定的预后类别。我们认为,这种区别对于从前列腺癌分析中获得更可靠的结果至关重要,有关前列腺癌的治疗预后预期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号