首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Experience with ureteroenteric strictures after radical cystectomy and diversion: open surgical revision.
【24h】

Experience with ureteroenteric strictures after radical cystectomy and diversion: open surgical revision.

机译:根治性膀胱切除和转移后输尿管肠狭窄的经验:开放式手术翻修。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long term results of the treatment of benign ureteroenteric strictures as a serious complication after urinary diversion and to highlight on the precautions for the active intervention. The outcomes of endoureteral and open surgical revisions in our patients are described. METHODS: Of 658 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from 1999 to 2009, 58 had developed benign stricture. The diversions used in this subgroup were orthotopic neobladder (53.4%), ileal conduit (27.6%), and ureterocolic (19%). The median interval to the diagnosis was 6 months, and 63.8% were on the left side. Endouretral interventions (dilation and stent or endoureterotomy) were the initial treatment in 37 patients. Thirty-two patients including patients who failed endoluminal interventions and patients with bilateral strictures underwent open surgery. Success was defined as radiologic improvement and the absence of flank pain, infection, or the need for a ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube. RESULTS: Endoscopic intervention was successful in 19 (51.3%) of 37 patients, principally those with strictures <1 cm with no difference between side, diversion type, or implantation technique. A total of 32 patients underwent open stricture resection and repair by direct implantation or tissue interposition to bridge long defects (6 Boari flaps and 7 ileal segments). At a median follow-up of 47 months, 25 patients had long-term success (78%) and 36 (83.7%) of 43 repaired units had improvement. Improvement was superior for right-sided strictures compared with left-sided strictures (100% vs 75.8%) and for neobladder compared with other diversions (90% vs 69%). Both anastomotic and ureteral strictures were repaired with equivalent results (87.5% vs 82.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Although endouretral procedures are viable treatment alternatives, open surgical revision is the preferred long-term definitive treatment. Bilateral and long left-sided strictures >1 cm long are indications for early open surgery.
机译:目的:评估输尿管良性狭窄作为尿路改道后的严重并发症的长期疗效,并强调积极干预的注意事项。描述了我们患者的子宫内膜切除术和开放式手术翻修的结果。方法:在1999年至2009年间对658例行膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术的患者中,有58例出现了良性狭窄。在该亚组中使用的转移是原位新膀胱(53.4%),回肠导管(27.6%)和输尿管(19%)。诊断的中位间隔为6个月,左侧为63.8%。腹腔内干预(扩张和支架或子宫内切开术)是37例患者的初始治疗方法。 32例患者(包括腔内介入治疗失败的患者和双侧狭窄的患者)接受了开放手术。成功的定义是放射学上的改善,并且没有侧面疼痛,感染或需要输尿管支架或肾造瘘管。结果:在37例患者中,有19例(51.3%)取得了成功的内镜干预,主要是狭窄<1 cm的患者,其侧面,转移类型或植入技术均无差异。共有32例患者接受了开放性狭窄切除术,并通过直接植入或组织介入来弥补长的缺损(6个Boari皮瓣和7个回肠段)。在47个月的中位随访中,有25例患者获得了长期成功(78%),而43例修复单元中有36例(83.7%)有所改善。右侧狭窄的改善优于左侧狭窄(100%vs. 75.8%),新膀胱的改善优于其他转移(90%vs 69%)。吻合口和输尿管狭窄均得到了修复(87.5%比82.8%)。结论:尽管尿道内手术是可行的治疗选择,但开放式手术翻修是首选的长期明确治疗。双侧和长于1 cm长的左侧狭窄是早期开放手术的指征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号