首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析经尿道前列腺电切术与微创治疗前列腺良性梗阻的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Emerging minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of patients with benign prostatic obstruction may have advantages over transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized trials published upto April 2008 comparing TURP with photoselective vaporization, holmium laser ablation, and bipolar TURP. A total of 38 articles reporting results from 21 trials were included (photoselective vaporization = 3; holmium laser ablation = 1; bipolar TURP = 17). An assessment of perioperative and postoperative outcomes up to 12 months indicates benefits for these procedures. However, long-term follow-up and stronger methodological quality of the evidence is required to assess the long-term durability of the technologies.
机译:新兴的微创手术治疗前列腺良性梗阻患者可能比经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)更具优势。我们对截至2008年4月的TURP与光选择性汽化,激光烧蚀和双极TURP进行比较的随机文献进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。共纳入38篇报道21项试验结果的文章(光选择性汽化= 3;激光烧蚀= 1;双极TURP = 17)。对围手术期和术后结局长达12个月的评估表明这些手术的益处。但是,需要长期随访和更强的方法学证据来评估技术的长期耐久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号