首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Hot flashes during androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist combined with steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogen for prostate cancer.
【24h】

Hot flashes during androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist combined with steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogen for prostate cancer.

机译:黄体激素释放激素激动剂与类固醇或非类固醇抗雄激素联合用于前列腺癌的雄激素剥夺治疗期间潮热。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate hot flashes and quality of life during combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy using steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogens. METHODS: A total of 151 patients with prostate cancer, who were enrolled into this study from May 2001 to June 2003, were randomized to receive CAB therapy using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (leuprorelin) combined with a steroidal antiandrogen (chlormadinone) or a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide). The incidence of, frequency of, and distress due to hot flashes were evaluated with a self-administered questionnaire during a 2-year period. The general and disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes were also measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire. RESULTS: Data were available for analysis from 124 patients. Although the incidence of hot flashes largely tended to be greater in the bicalutamide group than in the chlormadinone group, no significant difference was noted in the cumulative incidence of hot flashes at 2 years. The median frequency of hot flashes daily was 1.3 and 2.2 for warmth/flushing (P = .16) and 1.0 and 3.6 for sweating (P = .021) in the chlormadinone and bicalutamide groups, respectively. Patients in the chlormadinone group were significantly less likely to be distressed by warmth/flushing (odds ratio 0.47, P < .001) and sweating (odds ratio 0.61, P = .01) than were those in the bicalutamide group. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores over time showed no intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CAB using a steroidal antiandrogen such as chlormadinone might induce fewer and less-distressing hot flashes than CAB with bicalutamide.
机译:目的:研究使用类固醇或非类固醇抗雄激素的联合雄激素阻断(CAB)治疗期间的潮热和生活质量。方法:2001年5月至2003年6月共纳入研究的151例前列腺癌患者,随机选择接受黄体生成素释放激素激动剂(亮丙瑞林)与类固醇抗雄激素(氯麦定)或非甾体类抗雄激素(比卡鲁胺)。在两年期间,使用自我管理的问卷调查了潮热的发生率,频发和困扰。还使用“癌症治疗-前列腺功能评估”问卷对总体和特定疾病的生活质量结果进行了测量。结果:有124位患者的数据可供分析。尽管比卡鲁胺组的潮热发生率在很大程度上比氯麦酮治疗组高,但2年时潮热的累积发生率没有显着差异。氯麦定和比卡鲁胺组的每日潮热中位数分别为:温暖/潮热(1.36)(2.2)(P = .16)和出汗(P = .021)1.0(3.6)。与比卡鲁胺组相比,氯麦地酮组的患者因温暖/潮红(比值比为0.47,P <.001)和出汗(比值比为0.61,P = .01)而受苦的可能性要小得多。随着时间的推移,癌症治疗-前列腺评分的功能评估显示组间无差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,使用类固醇抗雄激素(如氯麦地酮)的CAB可能比使用比卡鲁胺的CAB引起的潮热更少,困扰更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号