首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >Porous landscapes - The case of Greater Copenhagen
【24h】

Porous landscapes - The case of Greater Copenhagen

机译:多孔景观-大哥本哈根地区的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many blueprints for urban development argue for the benefits of a sharp distinction between rural and urban space. While Such planning designs have been quite Successful in maintaining a physical distinction between rural and urban, major transformations of the socio-economic environment in peri-urban areas are creating a more diffuse and Porous interface.This paper examines socio-economic consequences of the current transformation of peri-urban areas. Three themes are elected for analysis: changing economies, Overall impact of urbanisation as perceived by the individual farm owner and the degree of their local orientation and engagement. Based on case Studies ill Greater Copenhagen, longitudinal trends and details of the Current situation are analysed. In addition, by differentiating between newcomers and longterm residents, possible future changes are indicated. The analysis shows that the importance of agriculture has declined, whereas Other gainful activities and residential use have increased. Thus, the functions Of the local economy and community are changing. An increasing proportion of the farm owners appreciate the proximity to urban agglomerations (public services, shopping, public transport, social relationships and markets), but this location also has drawbacks, for example in terms of uncertainty concerning future urban development, inconveniences For agricultural production and problems related to public access to private properties.Differences between newcomers and long-time residents are identified. Newcomers Without ally agricultural background are Frequent. They often work outside the municipality and are more frequently personally involved in Other gainful activities on-farm. Newcomers perceive more problems related to people accessing the farm properties and are less involved in local activities. In combination, these trends indicate possible Future increase in conflicts between farm owners and the public and that the local engagement may be declining. The analysis, however, also shows similarities between newcomers and long-time residents, and therefore does not indicate the development of two Cultures or "two nations". Rather, the urban fringe population is becoming more heterogeneous, ranging from full-time farmers to residents with their social and professional network outside the local area or people engaging in non-agricultural business on-farm. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:许多城市发展蓝图主张将城乡空间区分开来的好处。尽管这样的规划设计在保持城乡之间的实际区别方面已经非常成功,但城市周边地区社会经济环境的重大转变正在创造出更加分散和多孔的界面。本文研究了当前的社会经济后果郊区地区的转型。选择了三个主题进行分析:不断变化的经济,农场主个人认为城市化的总体影响以及他们在当地的定位和参与程度。基于大哥本哈根地区的案例研究,分析了纵向趋势和当前情况的细节。另外,通过区分新来者和长期居民,表明将来可能发生变化。分析表明,农业的重要性下降了,而其他有收益的活动和住宅使用却增加了。因此,当地经济和社区的功能正在发生变化。越来越多的农场主意识到靠近城市群(公共服务,购物,公共交通,社会关系和市场),但是这个位置也有缺点,例如在有关未来城市发展的不确定性,农业生产的不便方面以及新移民与长期居民之间的区别。没有同盟农业背景的新人很频繁。他们经常在市政当局以外工作,并经常参加农场中的其他有酬活动。新移民认为与人们进入农场财产有关的问题更多,而参与当地活动的机会则更少。综合起来,这些趋势表明,农场主与公众之间的冲突将来可能会增加,并且当地的参与度可能正在下降。但是,该分析还显示了新移民和长期居民之间的相似之处,因此,这并不表示两种文化或“两个民族”的发展。相反,城市边缘人群正变得更加多样化,从全职农民到在本地以外具有社交和专业网络的居民,或在农场从事非农业业务的人们。 (c)2007 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号