首页> 外文期刊>Child psychiatry and human development >Reliability and validity evidence of scores on the Slovene version of the questionnaire about interpersonal difficulties for adolescents.
【24h】

Reliability and validity evidence of scores on the Slovene version of the questionnaire about interpersonal difficulties for adolescents.

机译:斯洛文尼亚版问卷中有关青少年人际交往困难的分数的信度和效度证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study analyzed the psychometric properties of scores on the Slovene version of the Questionnaire about Interpersonal Difficulties for Adolescents (QIDA) in a sample of 1,334 adolescents (44% boys), ranging in age from 12 to 18 years (M = 15.61). Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the correlated five-factor structure of the QIDA: Assertiveness, Heterosexual Relationships, Public Speaking, Family Relationships, and Close Friendships. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were reasonable. Correlations of scores on the QIDA with scores of neuroticism, low extraversion, and low openness, as measured by the Inventory of Child/Adolescent Individual Differences, and scores of fear of negative evaluation, and tension and inhibition in social contacts, as measured by the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents were found, revealing differential links with QIDA subscale scores. Girls reported more difficulties than boys. Age differences showed a small but significant decrease in QIDA total score over adolescence.
机译:这项研究分析了1334名青少年(44%的男孩)样本,年龄在12至18岁之间的Slovene版本的《青少年人际关系问题问卷》(QIDA)中的得分的心理计量学特征(M = 15.61)。验证性因素分析复制了QIDA的相关五因素结构:自信,异性恋,公开演讲,家庭关系和亲密友谊。内部一致性和重测可靠性是合理的。 QIDA评分与神经质,低外向性和低开放度评分之间的相关性(如儿童/青少年个体差异量表所衡量),以及对负面评价的恐惧评分,社交接触中的紧张和抑制程度(如通过发现了青少年社交焦虑量表,揭示了与QIDA子量表得分的不同联系。女孩报告的困难比男孩更多。年龄差异显示,QIDA总分在青春期中有小幅但显着的下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号