首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Using neurobiological measures to predict and assess treatment outcome of psychotherapy in posttraumatic stress disorder: Systematic review
【24h】

Using neurobiological measures to predict and assess treatment outcome of psychotherapy in posttraumatic stress disorder: Systematic review

机译:使用神经生物学措施预测和评估创伤后应激障碍心理治疗的治疗结果:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are effective treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. However, little is known about their neurobiological effects. The usefulness of neurobiological measures to predict the treatment outcome of psychotherapy also has yet to be determined. Methods: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on neurobiological treatment effects of TF-CBT or EMDR and trials with neurobiological measures as predictors of treatment response. Results: We included 23 publications reporting on 16 separate trials. TF-CBT was compared with a waitlist in most trials. TF-CBT was associated with a decrease in heart rate and blood pressure and changes in activity but not in volume of frontal brain structures and the amygdala. Neurobiological changes correlated with changes in symptom severity. EMDR was only tested against other active treatments in included trials. We did not find a difference in neurobiological treatment effects between EMDR and other treatments. Publications on neurobiological predictors of treatment response showed ambiguous results. Conclusion: TF-CBT was associated with a reduction of physiological reactivity. There is some preliminary evidence that TF-CBT influences brain regions involved in fear conditioning, extinction learning and possibly working memory and attention regulation; however, these effects could be nonspecific psychotherapeutic effects. Future trials should use paradigms aimed specifically at these brain regions and physiological reactivity. There are concerns regarding the risk of bias in some of the RCTs, indicating that methodologically more rigorous trials are required. Trials with neurobiological measures as predictors of treatment outcome render insufficient results to be useful in clinical practice.
机译:背景:针对创伤的认知行为疗法(TF-CBT)以及眼球运动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)是创伤后应激障碍的有效治疗方法。但是,对其神经生物学作用了解甚少。神经生物学措施对心理疗法治疗效果的预测是否有用还没有确定。方法:系统评价随机对照试验(RCT),重点是TF-CBT或EMDR的神经生物学治疗效果以及以神经生物学措施作为治疗反应预测指标的试验。结果:我们纳入了23份出版物,报告了16项单独的试验。在大多数试验中,将TF-CBT与候补名单进行了比较。 TF-CBT与心率和血压的降低以及活动的变化有关,但与额叶大脑结构和杏仁核的体积无关。神经生物学变化与症状严重程度变化相关。 EMDR仅在纳入试验中针对其他有效疗法进行了测试。我们没有发现EMDR与其他治疗方法在神经生物学治疗效果上存在差异。关于治疗反应的神经生物学预测因子的出版物显示出模棱两可的结果。结论:TF-CBT与生理反应性降低有关。有一些初步证据表明,TF-CBT影响参与恐惧调节,消光学习以及可能的工作记忆和注意力调节的大脑区域。但是,这些影响可能是非特异性的心理治疗作用。未来的试验应使用专门针对这些大脑区域和生理反应性的范例。对于某些RCT中存在偏倚风险的担忧,表明需要在方法上进行更严格的试验。以神经生物学措施作为治疗结果的预测指标的试验结果不足,无法在临床实践中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号