首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound quarterly. >Ultrasound imaging of carotid artery stenosis: application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria to a Single Institution Clinical Practice.
【24h】

Ultrasound imaging of carotid artery stenosis: application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria to a Single Institution Clinical Practice.

机译:颈动脉狭窄的超声成像:放射医师学会在超声共识标准中对单个机构临床实践的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carotid duplex Doppler ultrasound (CDDU) is increasingly used for the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. In CDDU, velocity measurements are used to estimate the degree of ICA stenosis. Traditionally, radiologists have relied on institutional experience and published research when interpreting CDDU. In 2003, a consensus committee of experts convened as the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Committee and proposed standard criteria for grading ICA stenosis including the use of peak systolic velocity (PSV) of greater than 230 cm/s for assigning ICA stenosis of greater than 70%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria in classifying carotid stenoses. This study shows the following: (1) that the criterion of PSV of greater than 230 cm/s for angiographic stenosis of greater than 70% performs as predicted by the consensus committee, with sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.99) and specificity of 84.4% (95% CI, 0.80-0.88); (2) using Pearson correlations, there is no statistical difference found between the correlation of PSV with angiography (0.825 [95% CI, 0.792-0.853]), end diastolic velocity with angiography (0.762 [95% CI, 0.718-0.799]), and the ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) systolic ratio with angiography (0.766 [95% CI, 0.723-0.802]). The correlation of the ICA/CCA diastolic ratio with angiography (0.643 [95% CI, 0.584-0.696]) is less predictive at a 95% confidence interval than the other 3 velocity-based variables, and (3) when the 4 velocity-based variables are taken in pairs (eg, PSV and end diastolic velocity), there is no pair that shows statistically significant improvement in performance. Peak systolic velocity in combination with other variables does show a slight trend toward superior performance.
机译:颈双工多普勒超声(CDDU)越来越多地用于评估颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄。在CDDU中,速度测量用于估计ICA狭窄程度。传统上,放射科医师在解释CDDU时依靠机构经验并发表研究成果。 2003年,作为放射线共识医师协会的共识委员会召集了专家共识委员会,并提出了对ICA狭窄分级的标准标准,包括使用大于230 cm / s的峰值收缩速度(PSV)来确定ICA狭窄大于70%。本研究的目的是评估超声医师共识标准对颈动脉狭窄的分类的准确性。这项研究显示以下内容:(1)血管造影狭窄大于70%的PSV大于230 cm / s的标准符合共识委员会的预测,敏感性为95.3%(95%置信区间[CI]) ,0.89-0.99)和84.4%的特异性(95%CI,0.80-0.88); (2)使用Pearson相关性,PSV与血管造影的相关性(0.825 [95%CI,0.792-0.853]),舒张末期速度与血管造影的相关性(0.762 [95%CI,0.718-0.799])之间没有统计学差异。 ,血管造影显示ICA /颈总动脉(CCA)收缩率(0.766 [95%CI,0.723-0.802])。与其他3种基于速度的变量相比,在95%置信区间内,ICA / CCA舒张比与血管造影的相关性(0.643 [95%CI,0.584-0.696])的预测性较差;(3)当4种速度-基于变量的变量是成对获取的(例如PSV和舒张末期速度),没有对显示出统计学上显着的性能改善。收缩期峰值速度与其他变量的结合确实显示出了朝着卓越性能发展的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号