...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Re: Ultrasound for monitoring controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. W. P. Martins, C. V. R. Vieira, D. M. Teixeira, M. A. P. Barbosa, L. A. Dassun??o and C. O. Nastri. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 25-33
【24h】

Re: Ultrasound for monitoring controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. W. P. Martins, C. V. R. Vieira, D. M. Teixeira, M. A. P. Barbosa, L. A. Dassun??o and C. O. Nastri. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 25-33

机译:回复:用于监测受控卵巢刺激的超声:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。 W. P. Martins,C。V. R. Vieira,D。M. Teixeira,M。A. P. Barbosa,L。A. Dassun ?? o和C. O. Nastri。 2014年《超声产科妇产科》; 43:25-33

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Martins et al. present a meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating ultrasound monitoring for controlled ovarian stimulation. Reliance on almost daily blood tests used to be the mainstay of monitoring fertility treatment, but this has been largely superseded by ultrasound. Whether blood tests can be abandoned completely is still debateable, with progesterone levels prior to egg collection generating some interest; however, it would appear that performing both ultrasound imaging and blood tests, whilst providing more information, does not impart any significant advantage over scanning alone. If one had to decide on one or the other, I would opt for ultrasound.
机译:马丁斯等。目前对一项随机试验的荟萃分析,该试验研究了超声监测可控制的卵巢刺激。过去几乎每天都要进行血液检查,一直是监测生育治疗的主要手段,但这已被超声波所取代。是否可以完全放弃验血仍是有争议的,卵子采集前的孕激素水平引起了人们的兴趣。但是,在提供更多信息的同时执行超声成像和血液检查似乎并没有比单独扫描带来任何明显的优势。如果必须决定一个,我会选择超声检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号