首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Evaluating myometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer: Comparing subjective assessment with objective measurement techniques
【24h】

Evaluating myometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer: Comparing subjective assessment with objective measurement techniques

机译:评估子宫内膜癌女性的子宫肌层和宫颈浸润:主观评估与客观测量技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of subjective ultrasound assessment with that of objective measurement techniques in the evaluation of myometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study including 144 women with endometrial cancer undergoing transvaginal ultrasound. Myometrial and cervical invasion was evaluated subjectively, as well as objectively measured in different ways: endometrial thickness, tumor/uterine anteroposterior (AP) diameter ratio, minimal tumor-free margin, minimal tumor-free margin/uterine AP diameter ratio, tumor volume (three-dimensional (3D)), tumor/uterine volume (3D) ratio, and distance from outer cervical os to lower margin of tumor (Dist-OCO). Histological assessment following hysterectomy was the gold standard. Results: The sensitivity (72%) and specificity (76%) of tumor/uterine AP diameter (at cut-off, 0.53) were not significantly different from those of subjective evaluation (sensitivity, 77% (P = 0.44); specificity, 81% (P = 0.32)) for the prediction of deep myometrial invasion; all other objective measurement techniques had either a significantly lower sensitivity or a lower specificity. For all objective measurement techniques, except minimal tumor-free margin/uterine AP diameter ratio, fixing the sensitivity at the same level as that of subjective evaluation (i.e. 77%) gave a significantly lower specificity. Dist-OCO was the only parameter that might have potential to predict cervical invasion; it had a non-significantly higher sensitivity than did subjective evaluation (73% vs 54%, P = 0.06), but a significantly lower specificity (63% vs 93%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Subjective assessment of cervical and myometrial invasion is as good as or better than any objective measurement technique. The tumor/uterine AP diameter ratio and minimal tumor-free margin/uterine AP diameter ratio seem to be the best objective measurement techniques to predict deep myometrial invasion. It remains to be shown if objective measurements are useful to predict cervical invasion.
机译:目的:比较主观超声评估与客观测量技术对子宫内膜癌女性肌层和宫颈浸润的诊断准确性。方法:这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,包括144例经阴道超声检查的子宫内膜癌女性。主观评估子宫肌层和宫颈浸润,并以不同方式客观地评估:子宫内膜厚度,肿瘤/子宫前后位(AP)直径比,最小无肿瘤切缘,最小无肿瘤切缘/子宫AP直径比,肿瘤体积(三维(3D),肿瘤/子宫体积比(3D)以及从子宫颈外到肿瘤下缘的距离(Dist-OCO)。子宫切除术后的组织学评估是金标准。结果:肿瘤/子宫AP直径的敏感性(72%)和特异性(76%)(截止时为0.53)与主观评估无显着差异(敏感性为77%(P = 0.44);特异性, 81%(P = 0.32))用于预测深肌层浸润;所有其他客观测量技术的灵敏度或特异性均显着降低。对于所有客观的测量技术,除了最小的无肿瘤切缘/子宫AP直径比,将灵敏度固定在与主观评估相同的水平(即77%)会降低特异性。 Dist-OCO是唯一可能预测宫颈浸润的参数。与主观评估相比,它的敏感性没有显着提高(73%对54%,P = 0.06),但特异性却明显较低(63%对93%,P <0.001)。结论:宫颈和肌层浸润的主观评估与任何客观测量技术一样好或更好。肿瘤/子宫AP直径比和最小无肿瘤切缘/子宫AP直径比似乎是预测深层肌层浸润的最佳客观测量技术。客观测量是否可用于预测宫颈浸润尚待证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号