首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: Systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:产前超声诊断胎盘的鉴定:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective The accuracy of prospective sonographic prenatal detection of invasive placentation is unclear. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of ultrasound in at-risk women for prenatal identification of invasive placentation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched using the search terms 'placenta accreta', 'placenta increta', 'placenta percreta', 'ultrasound', 'magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)', 'invasive placenta' and 'infiltrative placenta'. Two authors independently abstracted data from the articles. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% CIs for each study were calculated. Forest plots and summary receiver-operating characteristics curves were produced. Between-study heterogeneity was explored both graphically and statistically. The MOOSE (meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were followed. Results Twenty-three studies involving 3707 pregnancies at risk for invasive placentation were included. The overall performance of ultrasound for the antenatal detection of invasive placentation was as follows: sensitivity, 90.72 (95% CI, 87.2-93.6)%; specificity, 96.94 (95% CI, 96.3-97.5)%; LR+, 11.01 (95% CI, 6.1-20.0); LR-, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23); and DOR, 98.59 (95% CI, 48.8-199.0). Among the different ultrasound signs, color Doppler had the best predictive accuracy (sensitivity, 90.74 (95% CI, 85.2-94.7)%; specificity, 87.68 (95% CI, 84.6-90.4)%; LR+, 7.77 (95% CI, 3.3-18.4); LR-, 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.29); and DOR, 69.02 (95% CI, 22.8-208.9)). Conclusions Ultrasound has a high accuracy for prenatal diagnosis of disorders of invasive placentation in high-risk women. The use of color Doppler improves the test performance.
机译:目的前瞻性超声产前检查有创胎盘的准确性尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是进行系统的审查和荟萃分析,以评估高危妇女在产前确定侵入性胎盘的超声表现。方法MEDLINE,EMBASE,系统评价的Cochrane数据库,效果评价摘要数据库(DARE)和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册(CENTRAL)使用搜索词“胎盘植入”,“胎盘植入”,“胎盘,'超声','磁共振成像(MRI)','侵入性胎盘'和'浸润性胎盘'。两位作者从文章中独立提取数据。计算每个研究的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性似然比(LR +和LR-),诊断比值比(DOR)及其95%CI。绘制了林区图和汇总的接收器操作特性曲线。研究之间的异质性在图形和统计上都得到了探索。遵循了MOOSE(流行病学中观察性研究的元分析)指南。结果纳入了23项研究,涉及3707例具有侵入性胎盘风险的妊娠。超声在产前检测侵袭性胎盘的总体表现如下:敏感性为90.72(95%CI,87.2-93.6)%。特异性96.94(95%CI,96.3-97.5)%; LR +,11.01(95%CI,6.1-20.0); LR-,0.16(95%CI,0.11-0.23); DOR为98.59(95%CI,48.8-199.0)。在不同的超声征象中,彩色多普勒具有最佳的预测准确性(敏感性为90.74(95%CI,85.2-94.7)%;特异性为87.68(95%CI,84.6-90.4)%; LR +为7.77(95%CI, 3.3-18.4); LR-,0.17(95%CI,0.10-0.29); DOR,69.02(95%CI,22.8-208.9)。结论超声对高危女性的侵袭性胎盘疾病的产前诊断具有较高的准确性。使用彩色多普勒可以提高测试性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号